Why is it that most communist leaders throughout history

>>2726915

Because only well off people know about the struggle of the proletariat duuh

File: 1493277533733.png (249KB, 359x361px) Image search: [Google]

249KB, 359x361px

>>2726915
>Stalin
>Kim Sung Il
>Mao
>Mugabe

>rich

File: FB_IMG_1490751793010.jpg (31KB, 600x426px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 600x426px

>>2726915
>Why is it that most leaders period throughout history were spoiled rich kids?

ftfy

>>2726915
was lenin a brainlet?

>>2726915
They have time to think and read about it and money to do something about it.

>>2726915
All I can remember is Che and he wasn´t even leader.

File: Danton_Marat_Robespierre_Lambinet.jpg (54KB, 405x276px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 405x276px

>>2726915
Why is it that most revolutionist leaders throughout history were spoiled rich kids?

File: 9714df019f62e28bcd2eaceeb9245b3701f304291993caef17f2f601ba832c50.gif (613KB, 498x498px) Image search: [Google]

613KB, 498x498px

>tfw Stalin was the most working class of the communist leaders
Really makes me think

>>2726996
>posting the middle and lower class revolutionaries of the French instead of the upper ones of the American
Come on senpai

>>2726915
What is his expression trying to convey?

>>2727151
Four strokes

>>2726931
None of these (except mao) were intelligentzia tho

Daddy issues.

>>2726963
kys

>>2726915
Because communist countries start with great unequal wealth distribution so their intelligentsia is that much richer than in Europe

>>2726931
Mao was rich IIRC

File: 74192970ab8e4d0e09b49553f363d079.jpg (21KB, 236x342px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 236x342px

Josip "Herman Goering" Broz Tito was a peasant until the day he died.

>>2727151
Didn't he go mad from syphilis?

File: IMG_7635.jpg (23KB, 220x340px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 220x340px

>>2726915

>Nestor Makhno was rich
>Durruti was rich
>Sankara was rich

You might need to be specific about your communists, OP.

>>2726996
Danton looks like a golem in all his pictures.

>>2728552
Makhno wasn't a communist.

File: 1453669408011.gif (554KB, 295x221px) Image search: [Google]

554KB, 295x221px

>>2726915
>"Haha bro u said u like comm'nism b.ut u g0t iphone hhaha"

>>2728563
He was really ugly

back in the day if you were a spoiled rich kid you would just invent a religion and tell everyone to become a buddhist, but only if they want to

now if you are a spoiled rich kid you become a commie and force everyone to become one by force

>>2728608
Funny how they picked one of the most handsome actors possible to play him in a biopic.

>>2728606
What are you implying?

>>2726915

At the risk of sounding like a very smart person, it seems the masses have always been seen and used as a tool to be wielded by competing elite factions.

Why should this be different with socialism?

>>2726915
>>2728635
Almost every political leader is rich or upper middle class.

You can't philosophize on an empty stomach. In America working class people are cucks who lack the time to run for office, write their thoughts and had to self censor themselves lest some bitch complain about them to their boss and get fired.

Americans use middle class as an euphemism, what they mean by middle class is just working class. The classical weberian definition of middle class is the lawyers, the doctors, the shopowners, i.e. those who don't have to depend on someone or a paycheck to earn their living, those who can be independent, who have money and can basically think and write and run for office. Weberian middle class is american upper middle class.

An upper middle class doctor can take a break and run for office, good luck trying to campaign without a year of paycheck.

>>2728670
I still don't get what you are implying after that rant, what's wrong about pointing out the retarded consumerism of someone who likes communism

>>2728526
He was born to a well of peasant but still a fucking peasant, like literal peasant.

File: 1492648803705.jpg (229KB, 853x1009px) Image search: [Google]

229KB, 853x1009px

>>2728676
I'm not the one who ranted, my point is you cant be a poor politician, no matter the ideology.

If you are implying hypocracy of karl marx, you will be throwing rocks from a glass house, see pic related.

Not that I agree with the picture, but one should attack the argument not the man, Milton Friedmans life or hypocracy does not give or take from its thoughts and ideologies. If you have a beef with marx or with friedman again, attack their arguments not the man themselves

>>2728563
Small Pox and a bull kicking you twice in the face as a child will do that to you.

>>2728698
>>2728676
to add
>poor politican*
or a philosopher, or a writer etc etc you get the idea

so whether from left or right those who think about the poor will always come from the top class, how come he talks about poor while he himself is not poor is oxymoronic, poor neither have the time nor the means to be political or to philosophize

Milton Friedman talked and wrote a lot about the factory workers in 3rd world country, should we discard his arguments because he is a pompeous 1st worlder who never did manual labor?

>>2728567
He was AnCom

>>2728698
>>2728713
So you be trying to tell me that ideologies are fucking bullshit and its creators phonies?

File: FB_IMG_1489594780880.jpg (38KB, 470x700px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 470x700px

>>2728786
No. He's trying to tell you that the quality of an idea is irrespective of the nature of its originator.