Has there ever been any studies on group performance where they

>>2697884

Hundreds, possibly thousands. The most obvious are the Milgram experiment and the Third Wave.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ICng-KRxXJ8

>>2697884
>I imagine this would increase group performance, as they would be willing to work harder to help their group (or tribe)

This is the general finding, yes. In particular those who have trouble fitting in to normal society thrive in such conditions.

>>2697953
Interesting. How come we never hear about it then? But we always hear about the advantages of diversity.

>>2698085
It doesn't benefit the top 10% of society quite as much.

>>2698130
How so?

>>2697884
Have you even bothered to google it? There's literally thousands

>>2698085
"Diversity gives us strength" I always ask what strength it gives us, I have yet to get an adequate answer. People don't talk about it because it runs counter to the main stream narrative.

It benefits employers because a more diverse workforce causes lower trust. Lower trust means that you are less likely to care about your fellow coworkers, so you are less concerned with whether or not your employer is unfair. Group strategy ALWAYS beats individual strategy, so it's natural for employers to want to weaken the employee collective. I don't like marxism, but it has some valid points occasionally. It's not necessarily about keeping the common man down, it's about making them less capable of shaking up the company.