where's the Aristotelian golden mean between faithfulness

>>2689160
>dont do to others what you dont want done to you
Nobody said you couldn't have asshole standards

>>2689160
>faithfulness and unfaithfulness
Recognizing when your faith is misplaced and retracting it.
>honesty and dishonesty
Dishonesty in the short term to aid in a long term more honest goal
>between being ethical or not
Changing your ethics when the situation proves your old ethics ineffective.

>>2689183
wrong

>>2689160
Aristotle specifically said the golden mean does not apply to everything, for example there is no reason not to be only moderately virtuous

>>2689160
being ethical,faithful and honest: fapping to mary

being unethical, unfaithful and dishonest: NOT fapping to mary

>>2689160
You don't understand the golden mean, anon.
>where's the Aristotelian golden mean between faithfulness and unfaithfulness
There isn't, because those two aren't the two extreme. Blind devotion and unfaithfulness are the two extremes, with faithfulness in the middle.
>honesty and dishonesty?
Again, honesty is the middle, dishonesty and being unable to mediate is the the other.

>>2691547
Wrong

>>2693246
So say something right, faggot

>>2693281
no

>>2690957
>Aristotle specifically said the golden mean does not apply to everything
This

If you aim to be virtuous about everything, then you would be seeking an extremity in possessing virtuosity.