Memes aside,would alexander hamilton establishing an american

File: confused_nigger_girl.jpg (18KB, 403x389px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 403x389px

>>2681106
This is just a "monarchy is da best" thread disguised as a legitimate question, isn't it?

>>2681154
>Would establishing an American monarchy really be a bad thing

Possibly not.

>Would Alexander Hamilton establishing an American Monarchy really be a bad thing

Yes.

America is turning into a monarchy with its own dinasties (e.g., Bush, Clinton) and whatnot. Sad.

Crowns are so kitsch

>hehe my hat is so fancy

>>2681615
That's partly why I for one campaigned so heavily against Queen Hillary.

File: tmp_21515-1469628102982-1139507995.jpg (41KB, 456x352px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 456x352px

>>2681626
>he doesn't like fancy hats
pleb

>>2681106
I rather like that pic.

File: 1452579511593.gif (2MB, 336x199px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 336x199px

>>2681106
>tfw American monarchy is declared an "Emperor" because he technically rules over 50 self-governing nations
>tfw the bearer of the arms is a Bald Eagle Aquila
>tfw we're already roman as fuck
>tfw the Roman Republic only lasted around 490 years
>The American Republic has lasted 241 years
>We could get a real life Caesar soon

My body is ready.

>>2681615
Oligarchy, you mean.

>>2682752
We could also end up being the carthage to russia's rome
Or germany is the carthage to noth america and russia

File: 1490979105959.jpg (21KB, 451x469px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 451x469px

>>2682947
>Russia is Eastern Rome's successor arguably
>America is the West reborn
>together we combine to form the Neo Imperium Romanum
>together we will conquer the world and bring peace to the human race

God, my body is ready for this. Make it happen.

>>2682752

lost it.

>>2681615
>I don't know what a monarchy is

>>2682989
There will be no peace until one race rules supreme.
Tribalism and racism is an innate part of human nature.

>>2681106
an American monarchy would have likely discredited the nation from the beginning, with the Great Powers of Europe seeing the ruling family as illegitimate at best and an insult to the old royal families at worst.

A monarchy's stability rests on its reputation, with centuries old dynasties already existing such as the Von Hapsburgs, Bourbons, Savoys and Hanovers, an ex-english colonist such as Hamilton or Jefferson claiming their own new dynasty would be taken as a complete joke by the rest of the western world, or an insult, and would be isolated from crucial diplomatic relations the county needed to survive its first few years, namely France.

In a way, the US being a republic was the best course of action to be taken seriously as a nation, a monarchy with no royal ties is seen as nothing more than pretenders to a throne that has no credibility to stand on.

>>2681615
The Clinton dynasty is over, they only have one daughter.

>>2683275
>There will be no peace until one race rules supreme.
>Tribalism and racism is an innate part of human nature.
That's not really true.

Race relations are bad in America because most of the minorities belong to ethnic groups with an average IQ close to mental retardation.

I'm not convinced that racism would exist in a hypothetical society made of culturally homogeneous (cultural homogeneity is important, granted) white and east asian people. I think race mixing would eventually occur.

>>2681615
That's an oligarchy, but you're right that positions of power often end up in the hands of insiders in high places, even the Italian city-republics found the name Medici getting elected again and again.

Those who have power in any form aren't willing to give it up, whether it be as a monarchy or a republic, so family ties and insider nepotism makes sure that the those closest to the ones in power remain in power.

>>2683339

Maybe if it was someone like Jefferson, though the Americans did offer the crown to the Kaiser.

>>2683353
The problem is the crippling poverty and general glorification of violence by American citizens of any race. If drug abuse wasn't rampant and our education wasn't utter shit, we'd likely have a lot less racial conflict. And crime.

>>2681106
Yes. A monarchy would have proven far less stable in the following 200 years.

Yes, even after we take the Civil War into account.

>>2682752
>America is the new Rome
There are only two kind of people in america, retards and jews.

>>2683491
>A monarchy would have proven far less stable in the following 200 years.
Why?
Though, it should have been a kind of federated empire. Multiple kingdoms under an emperor.

>>2681106
Monarchy in the US is completely and utterly opposed to everything the original strain stood for, and I say this as a Brit. It would never have taken off and rightly so.

>>2683520
Rome gave the world Caligula and had Jews in it. It still fits.

File: tumblr_inline_nr6h4dKfXY1qe66o3_500.jpg (83KB, 427x458px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 427x458px

>>2681106
> United
> Empire
> of America

>>2684176
>opposed to everything the original strain stood for
Yea? What's that?

>>2684260

"I shouldn't have to pay for my nation's security."

>>2681106
it wouldn't be as efficient