How can I as an Atheist justify the Mandate of Heaven for rightful

show us your trilby

>>2675064
You literally can't

You are gonna be forced to make relativist or pragmatic arguments, there is no objective arguments for a heavenly mandate unless you're a faithfag

Pretend to be religious.

>>2675064
You can't unless you lie, and provide the same meme argument:
>you were appointed by god
Thus, you can't question "God"

>>2675085
How is a pragmatic argument not objective?

>>2675250
l2read

He said:
>there is no [objective arguments for a heavenly mandate] unless you're a faithfag

It's objective, but it doesn't supporta heavenly mandate.

File: Emperor Taizong.png (119KB, 250x441px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 250x441px

>>2675064
Easy.
The cunt who wont the civil war has Mandate of Heaven.
Accept that cunt as your emperor or get jian'd

>>2675250
You can pragmatically argue for a tyranny without relying on the heavenly meme

>>2675250

Different Anon here, but I would assume because it would eventually spiral into reliance on relativism anyway.

>>2675064
Nice thread.