Why is it bad to talk positively about "patriotism" nowadays? What are the current alternatives to unite a huge amount of people under the same ideas?
>>2645179
>Why is it bad to talk positively about "patriotism" nowadays?
It isn't.
It isn't bad to talk about it, liberals just conceptualize patriotism as being devoted to the liberal state's embodiment of bullshit, meaningless libtard ideas like "tolerance" rather than devotion to one's own kinship group.
>>2645226
fpbp
>>2645179
it got rebranded as liberal cultural sensitivity so basically anything that makes you non aggressive hence stagnating any ever possible form of progress yet retaining a couple of petrodollar based industries of influential size to control a global population of 7 billion with X gdp
because anything americans touch turn into cancer
>>2645226
I think this varies from country to country and from region to region. Maybe things are different were you live.
>>2645322
>petrodollar
>see exporting dollars based on cancer
>see mercantilism never for one second ever fell out of favour
>see cancerous blow back and the destruction of the inner circles
g edward griffin
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=udWXFC2sWU8
>>2645232
Why can't people talk about their political opponents without being so butthurt that they call the total of their ideas "bullshit" and specific ideas "meaningless"? Ironically, the accusation of being "bullshit" is as vague, and therefore as bereft of any meaning extending beyond general disapproval, as possible.
Because it's an adversary ideology to globalism, and the globalist people own the media, academia and your boss.
>>2645404
>globalism
Implying Globalism isn't just another way to say Terran Patriotism.
>>2645336
North Americans, to be precise.