Are there any good books I can read on Salazar's Estado

>I want people that agree with me to tell me what I already think

Loser.

Your intellectual growth would actually be better served by reading a Marxist analysis and applying critical thought to it.

>>2644017
If I wanted to read cancer I would. A fascist or conservative is just as able to criticize Salazar's regime and not focus on muh racism and muh colonies for the entire length of the book, but actual issues.

I could read an entire book written by a Marxist on the problems with fascist Italy but they will only tell me how much they oppose colonialism, racism, fascism and other things on an ideological level, rather than actual problems with the regime such as a weak military and lacking industry.

You're a fucking retard. Fuck off and kill yourself.

>>2644111

>Historical materialists not focusing on the materialism

I guess you've never actually read a Marxist author, have you.

>>2644138
>analysing history using the ideology of an economically and politically illiterate NEET kike who failed to grasp even the most basic of life's lessons

>>2644012
Everyone pans Estado Novo for having such massive holes in it though.

>>2644111
You won't find one. Classical-into-neoliberalism is the predominant analytical perspective for nearly all historiography. Conservatives by and large transitioned into stodgy, curmudgeony neoliberals, and fascists -- well, they lost, in the long run, so of course they're gone.

Marxist historical works haven't been prevalent in decades, either. Leftist? Sure, droves of 'em. But not nearly as many rigorously Marxist texts as people would like to believe.

>>2644159
I'm not looking for propaganda. Just a non-lefty analysis that doesn't scream Estado Novo was racist and colonialist.

>>2644163
You're saying there isn't a single right-of-center author who wrote about fascist Portugal or Spain?

File: Screen Shot 2017-04-10 at 11.57.08 PM.png (201KB, 391x647px) Image search: [Google]

201KB, 391x647px

>>2644292

File: Screen Shot 2017-04-11 at 12.02.07 AM.png (196KB, 376x615px) Image search: [Google]

196KB, 376x615px

>>2644302

File: Screen Shot 2017-04-11 at 12.07.00 AM.png (229KB, 462x694px) Image search: [Google]

229KB, 462x694px

>>2644305

File: Screen Shot 2017-04-11 at 12.14.02 AM.png (194KB, 469x738px) Image search: [Google]

194KB, 469x738px

>>2644336

File: Screen Shot 2017-04-11 at 12.17.18 AM.png (179KB, 462x691px) Image search: [Google]

179KB, 462x691px

>>2644357

File: Screen Shot 2017-04-11 at 12.21.42 AM.png (179KB, 445x699px) Image search: [Google]

179KB, 445x699px

>>2644358

>>2644012
The biggest slight against Salazar's regime was his keenness to remain isolated from the rest of the world. It didn't do Portugal any good

File: Screen Shot 2017-04-11 at 12.27.44 AM.png (181KB, 437x689px) Image search: [Google]

181KB, 437x689px

>>2644372

>Where can I read a book on my idol I know nothing about that won't say anything that triggered me

Fixed that for you, /pol/baby

File: Screen Shot 2017-04-11 at 12.31.00 AM.png (180KB, 468x696px) Image search: [Google]

180KB, 468x696px

>>2644390
>salazar never restored the death penalty
damn...

>>2644111
>I don't want anyhting that talks about muh colonies

Are you a retard? The Colony wars was a HUGE issue for Portugal and the defining reason he was overthrown

Portugal lost like 10,000 soldiers during the war, which for a country of 8 million (1970 pop.) would be equal to the US losing 400,000. How do you think Americans would react to the US losing 400,000 conscripts fighting niggers for no reason other than pride?

This type of stupidity is why /pol/ needs to be banned from /his/

File: Screen Shot 2017-04-11 at 12.39.10 AM.png (195KB, 500x734px) Image search: [Google]

195KB, 500x734px

>>2644402

>>2644415
>>2644393
>no reading comprehension

wew

>>2644415
>This type of stupidity is why /pol/ needs to be banned from /his/
I know right? Let's make /his/ into a reddit tier safe space marxist echo chamber.

>>2644535

What about banning both /pol/ and reddit brainlets like (you) and then /his/ will be great again.