Everyone in the world is an agnostic because nobody knows whether

File: 1482173910424.png (686KB, 634x875px) Image search: [Google]

686KB, 634x875px

Actually, I do know.

But I am not allowed to say.

>>2642281
>just trust me famalam
someone will fall for this yet again

File: socrates.jpg (1MB, 3012x3131px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3012x3131px

I used to know nothing.
Now I know God.
Do I still know nothing?

Not true.

People who believe in god always claim to know.

>>2642281
>wtf I love theism now
Everyone loves a good cup of cha. ;)

>>2642322
I prefer a nice cup of warm semen, but to each his own.

>>2642275
Agnosticism is admitting your ignorance, not just being ignorant.

>>2642314

Arguably you now know less than nothing.

>>2642317

So? People always claim to be surprised when a quite friendly neighbour turns out to be a psychopath serial killer, turns out, what people claim to "know" ain't worth a hill of shit.

>>2642373

It is not.

But in this argument, the people who believe in god always claim to know, the people who don't believe in god rarely make the same claims.

>>2642365
Nice meme.

>>2642275
>My ignorance is imputed to the entire human race.

Holy shit the hubris.

>>2642387
>I understand everything
Holy shit the hubris

>>2642451

You will never catch me claiming omniscience.

The fucking "you can't know what I don't know" is absolutely bollocks.

>>2642381

OP is claiming that everyone is agnostic whether or not they realise it, not that everyone is a self-aware agnostic.

Personally, I think "agnostic" is a label made up by atheists who don't want to hurt their religious friend's and family's feelings (or fall foul of religiously motivate bigotry by being openly godless).

>>2642485
It's a more defensible position than the absolutely untenable position "There is no God".

But there's no real distinction between the two. There is no fence to straddle.

>>2642373
>So? People always claim to be surprised when a quite friendly neighbour turns out to be a psychopath serial killer, turns out, what people claim to "know" ain't worth a hill of shit.
Then they obviously didn't knew.
Fallibilism is correct, suck my dick.

>>2642387
Feel free to show me any human who has the facts babe.

>>2642504
>absolutely untenable position "There is no God".

What about the claim "there is no santa claus"? Is that untenable?

Protip: It's not "knows," it's "believes"

>>2642275
>Everyone on earth is Hindu, since achieving Moksha is attainable through any religious path
Really activates those almonds, huh