How was the rise of nazi Germany seen in the rest of the world. Mostly before the real aggression began
I know the world is "smaller" today and information travels, but such a huge transfer of power to a single party and massive nationalism from a country on the level of Germany would be around the clock world news.
or was the world so different back then that nobody really cared until they started invading other countries
The west was happy with it at first as it was a bulwark against communism. Then Churchill and his Jewish handlers got into power and forced Hitler's hand. In America under 50 percent at least wanted to get involved in WWII before Roosevelt false flagged Pearl Harbor. And most of the antagonism was towards the japs, fighting Germany was just something we were obligated to do since we picked a side.
>>2633779
When Hitler was just reclaiming German-speaking lands, people really didn't care. When he had the Kristallnacht and annexed Czechoslovakia, people figured out he was fine with violence.
>>2633791
>false flag Pearl Harbor
Is this a meme? I'm new around here
>>2633802
Read Day of Deciet. Roosevelt absolutely le it happen and there is also evidence he actually coaxed the Japanese into attacking. This was the only way to enter the war as American Public was absolutely against it.
>>2633791
>Then Churchill and his Jewish handlers got into power and forced Hitler's hand.
>sure, we'll look the other way while you re-arm
>sure, we'll look the other way while you re-militarize the rhineland
>sure, we'll look the other way while you annex austria
>sure, we'll look the other way while you dismember our ally
Clearly, ((((((((((Britain)))))))))) was hell-bent on war with Germany.
I really feel so bad for Chamberlain, he worked with Hitler in good faith, all logic and good sense was with him, who could want another war just 20 years after the war? Everyone knew how horrible war is but (((Hitler))) couldn't be reasoned with and he had to destroy Europe, costing millions of lives and ruining nationalism for all future generations.
>>2633779
Negatively. They were considered dangerous barbarians. After few years and the economy "miracle" some people started to admire Hitler.
>>2633802
Flase flag is too strong. They would have known the Nips had a hornet in thier bonnet and were pissing fire for the U.S. Navy. Naval intelligence supposedly had some warning that the Jap fleet was steaming with a funny rape look around the pacific and Pearl was a possibility. That intelligence was supposedly passed up like a Chinese telephone got hushed a little softer until it reached the top. Roosevelt probably was told "Japs will start shit soon" and he just smilled and pissed into a pot under his desk while his secretary dabbed is flaccid polio dick dry.
>>2633816
>"Stop being imperialists or we won't give you any more oil"
>Coaxing
>>2633779
It was viewed as futuristic and progressive. Most of the foreigners who went to the 36 Olympics loved it.
>>2633816
Even if he Let It Happen on Purpose (LIHOP) that's not a false flag as you claimed before. All false-flag and LIHOP theories share the same glaring flaw though, that military action could have been as easily justified by simply acknowledging that there was evidence of a planned attack as it would be if an attack actually occurred. Had Roosevelt presented Congress with evidence Japanese forces planned to attack Pearl Harbor, they would have no choice but to respond. LIHOP Pearl Harbor would mean Roosevelt thought the equipment at Pearl Harbor was disposable as well, which it absolutely wasn't, and would have been better put to use in the pacific theater, which was obvious to everyone was going to be a difficult battle given Japan's island isolation and their willingness to go as far to arm their own young children.