I ask all you LARPERs and 'history buffs' one question:
War, what is it good for?
Absolutely nothing
This is why I love Elaine, such an inspiring intellectual.
Say it again
Ugh give it to me
>>2621597
Distracting the underclass and letting the elite advance their agendas.
>>2621605
Jerry=George>Elaine=Kramer>the rest
Technological advancement
>>2621653
t. fat uneducated /pol/ slob who watched a doco on the history channel once
>>2621663
He isn't wrong. Nice deflection of calling him a /pol/ack though. You almost had to provide an arugment
>>2621597
Thinning the herd.
>>2621597
Seinfeld is trash, don't know why anyone likes it.
>>2621653
the correlation between war and technology is due to disruptions in the balance of power caused by technology leading to war
>>2622160
>Seinfeld is trash
Stay mad, kiddo. Seinfeld was/is the single greatest Sitcom in the 20th century. It probably still is. Just because you don't go outside and thus can't relate to the social quagmires the characters experience doesn't mean it's trash.
Curb Your Enthusiasm is funnier, but Seinfeld covers more appreciable social situations through the lense of self-centered narcissists.
>>2622160
Feed me your anger, Reddit. This is one thing that you just can't be a contrarian to. Like the X-Files.
>>2622184
No.
Source: Most military technology has historically been developed during wartime
1. National security
2. Preserving one's civilization
3. Destroying true evil
4. Securing a more complete peace
5. Treasure
6. Technology
7. Economic gains
8. Justice
9. Punishment
10. International security
I could go on and on.
>>2621663
insert that quote from the Third Man
ABSOLUTELY NOTHING
>>2621632
This
>>2622818
>1.Spooks
>2.Spooks
>3.Spooks
>4.Spooks
>5.Not Spook
>6.Not Spook but debatable
>7.Not Spook but debatable
>8.Spooks
>9.Spooks
>10.Spooks also war is the worst way to guarantee that
Giving 14 year old boys hard-ons.
>>2621649
George > Jerry > Elaine = Kramer > Newman