No holds barred fight, Teddy Roosevelt with an ice axe vs Winston Churchill with a saber.
Who would win?
You can't really fight with an ice axe since you cant stab. Churchill would be able to block and thrust easily
>>2619072
the ice axe has a sharp point on the bottom end, you can thrust with that.
>>2618513
:)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owTPZQQAVyQ
>>2619216
This. The ice axe also looks longer than a saber, which would give him a reach advantage.
In general, I'd give the fight to Teddy. The guy was actually a pretty accomplished fighter. He was a decent boxer, wrestler, and was one of the first westerners to achieve a high rank in Judo. As far as I know, Churchill's hand to hand skills don't really compare to that.
does Teddy get prep-time
But wait! A new contender arrives to the arena.
>>2619257
no, but he can take a tactical leak and brush up his make-up before the fight.
>>2618513
if Ted can take the isthmus from Panama, he can take a sword from a faggot.
>>2618513
Churchill, he had plenty of training with the saber and it is the better weapon.
Saber is an actual killing weapon, and was practiced with as a weapon.
Ice axe is too much of a handicap I think
>>2618513
Teddy Roosevelt was an asthmatic nerd who larped as a cowboy and soldier
Churchill was real deal
I mean Roosevelt is kind of stuck in a wheelchair. So, Churchill.
>>2620134
That bait is so stale I cant even use it to catch dinosaurs.
>>2618513
Are they mounted?
>>2619072
>block
>a 3 foot long ice axe
>with a saber
heh