>Declares war on a neutral nation leading to the most damaging

Here's your reply

>do everything not to go to war
>german austism won't stop can't stop
>destroys europe for the second time in 2 decades

What drives the kr**t to be so perfidious?

>>2616291
Everyone knows they unfairly lost too much land after WW1, they were just correcting the *nglos wrongs.

>>2616307

>anglos
>not french

>eastern annexations had anything to do with versailles


how can g*rman delusion run this deep?

>>2616281
If anything his problem wasn't he was too militaristic. It was he was too weak.

File: 1304376955947.png (299KB, 500x375px)

299KB, 500x375px

>>2616307
>lose war
>Reeeeeee. Why are you taking my land?

>>2616344
It was a defensive war caused by things out of Germany's control.

File: 4603984.jpg (27KB, 400x400px)

27KB, 400x400px

>>2616281
>neutral nation

>>2616356
Name a single thing Germany did that made them the aggressor towards Britain.

>>2616352
It was out of Britain's control too but the rules of war still allow for the conquered land to submit to the conqueror. That is fair.

File: main-qimg-b5c683659c390e767f3bc71a4fbda355.gif (37KB, 600x650px)

37KB, 600x650px

>>2616363
Except Germany was the one that conquered land. Why didn't they get to keep this land?

>>2616358
They attacked a country openly allied (no secret treaty or so) with Britain.

>>2616358
Invade poland

>>2616286
>>2616291
>>2616356
>>2616344
>>2616363
>M-Muh BRITAIN

>>2616372
>*nglos force Polands occupation of German lands
>Save literal germans taking back what is yours
>the eternal *nglo throws a hissy fit and declares war on someone saving its own people from bullshit versailles treaty.

>>2616281
>What drives the *nglo to be so perfidious?

The fear that he blood on their hands might dry up.

Seeing how so many people jump to defending Britain as the good guys shows just how brainwashed by so much ww2 media about "muh killing naughziis"

File: thinkingfyi.jpg (86KB, 1000x762px)

86KB, 1000x762px

>>2616376
what did Kraut mean by this?

>>2616389
t. American LARPing as a German

File: 1490827355226.jpg (117KB, 634x613px)

117KB, 634x613px

>>2616281
>sure, we'll look the other way while you re-arm
>sure, we'll look the other way while you re-militarize the rhineland
>sure, we'll look the other way while you annex austria
>sure, we'll look the other way while you dismember our ally

Clearly, ((((((((((Britain)))))))))) was hell-bent on war with Germany.
I really feel so bad for Chamberlain, he worked with Hitler in good faith, all logic and good sense was with him, who could want another war just 20 years after the war? Everyone knew how horrible war is but (((Hitler))) couldn't be reasoned with and he had to destroy Europe, costing millions of lives and ruining nationalism for all future generations.

>>2616352
>this is what /pol/tards actually believe
can you describe these 'things' and how the remilitarization of Germany was out of german control

File: 1491392560681.jpg (18KB, 400x400px)

18KB, 400x400px

>>2616376
Good post, Hans.

>>2616376
this man gets it

>>2616408
He's talking about World War I.

>>2616406
it's been part of german foreign policy since it's inception under bismarck to unite the germanic peoples but also the entire continent of europe under one empire, people forget that

>>2616463
The Schlieffen plan was carried out with full knowledge of what it would entail - the intervention of the UK. It was the krauts who escalated the conflict by backing Austria, who otherwise would have stood down in the face of the Entente.

>>2616625
Bismarck himself did not want a unification of german peoples.