Why have there been no religious miracles since the invention

Trump got elected

>>2602844
Because all so called miracles are just propaganda from followers of charlatans

Fairy tales aren't real, truly amazing.

They won't understand evolution even if they know all the mechanisms that cause it, but they'll say miracles are real by citing a book written by sand semites

American victory over the Soviets in 1985 hockey.

Countless diseases have been cure.

We literally invented flying machines.

"Green Revolution" has drastically increased crop yields, meaning fewer people are starving.

But sure, "no miracles".

I don't think you really need to ask this question.

>>2602879
not religious
not religious
not religious
and
not religious

>>2602844
>what is the miracle of the sun
>what is the stigmata of Padre Pio

>>2602844

Nonsense.

Since the invention of the camera a literal God has been reincarnated on Earth and worked miracles.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZXqBg1Uirbo

>>2602844
I'm guessing the excuse would be that miracles exist to be revealed to the faithful and that life is a test of faith so that's why god doesn't just reveal himself to everyone

>>2602879
>All of these things are directly caused by human actions
>They're miracles though :^)

>>2602994
Why wouldn't he? It makes no sense.

>>2603027
coz it's a test, did you not read my post?

>>2602844

have there been unexplainable healings? doesnt have to be a case of people praying or saying some god saved them, just cases of people who should 100% be dead and somehow healed completely leaving doctors dumbfounded.

>implying
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a54iqEr1flQ

>>2603077

Derren Brown literally taught someone off the street how to do that sort of thing and successfully put on a show.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iuP5uOI7Xwc

>>2602994
It seems like people living in the past that experienced miracles had a way easier time passing the test and not having a faith crisis, which is especially rough for people nowadays considering the punishment for not passing the test is literally eternal torture

>christcucks literally believe magicians are actually doing magic

You can't make this up

>>2602953
This desu senpai

>>2603027
God reveals himself = you KNOW there's a God and feel you HAVE TO follow him because "shit, I don't wanna burn forever"

God doesn't reveal himself = the choice to believe is yours

It's a test.

>>2602879
He said religious miracles autist

>>2603151
>It's a test
>Except for the people he literally reveal himself to
>or the people he otherwise directly influenced

File: sun_miracle2.jpg (314KB, 1320x742px) Image search: [Google]

314KB, 1320x742px

>>2602844
False premise.
There have been plenty of miracles since the invention of the camera almost two hundred years ago, what you are actually asking is why has no miracle been captured on camera in a convincing way in close to two hundred years.

A). Cameras did not achieve true ubiquity until the last ten years, prior to that they were expensive specialist items
B). Until recently any amateur cameras in widespread use were primitive contraptions with limited capabilities.
C). Cameras in general have inferior image resolution when compared to the human eye, and getting them to actually record a decent image in all light conditions is a complicated affair.
D). A still image is poorly suited for recording a momentous event, reliant on miraculous timing in itself to capture an image that not only records the event clearly but establishes a clear narrative as well. Moving cameras obviously obviate this problem but they are even more effected by the vulnerabilites I listed prior, being more expensive, more complicated, and less ubiquitious to still cameras until recently.

Until the tsunami of 2004 there were no good photographs of tsunamis despite the camera existing since 1830, would you have been puzzled by that as well?

>>2603249
>Cameras did not achieve true ubiquity until the last ten years, prior to that they were expensive specialist items

Kek, spot the little kid. They weren't built into our phones but I can assure you pretty much everyone teenage and above in developed countries owned a camera in 2007, or 1997 for that matter.

>>2603242
they'd probably argue that he was revealed to them because they earned it. You can see the same ideas in Hinduism with the castes. People think they're of a higher caste because they're better souls than other people who are lower than them, and it must be so because they deserve it.

>>2603354
>They weren't built into our phones but I can assure you pretty much everyone teenage and above in developed countries owned a camera in 2007, or 1997 for that matter.
Owning a camera is not the same thing as having one on you at all times of the day as is the case with cellphone cameras. What good is your cute little Olympus XA when you stumble across big foot in the woods when you left it home in your sock drawer?

Besides as I already pointed out amateur cameras have limited capabilities compared to professional models, due to fixed lens, primitive automation, and other "features" added in order to create an idiot proof mass-market version of a precision instrument.
>OH SHIT A UFO! BETTER TAKE A PICTURE EVEN THOUGH ITS TOO FAR AWAY FOR MY 35MM LENS TO CAPTURE CLEARLY. GEE I HOPE THE AUTO FOCUS ACTUALLY WORKS, THE LIGHT METER DOESN'T METER THE WRONG THING, AND IT'S NOT TOO DARK FOR THE SPEED OF FILM IN MY CAMERA. OH SHIT THERE ISN'T ACTUALLY ANY FILM IN MY CAMERA....

t. person in a developed country who owned a camera in 1997 which is why he knows expecting miracles to be captured on film by amateur photographers is a miracle in itself

>>2603531

>all these excuses

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b2m7dficJ3o

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_2NvwlnKVtU

>>2603531
So given enough time and preparation we could expect to see "miracles" be recorded on film/cameras?

File: 1473206227222.jpg (102KB, 550x488px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 550x488px

>>2602844
Why havn't any new species of bacteria been evolved in a lab since the invention of peer reviewed microbiology?

>>2603834

They have. Even the people that pump out Creationist propaganda gave up on that line a good decade ago, mate and now just say "it's sill not (((((((macroevolution))))))!!!"