How brutal was medieval warfare actually? Compared to antiquity.

Dude Sieges LMAO
Most deaths and casualties for soldiers throughout the middle ages would have been from disease and supply issues. Unless you were in a particularly bloody time you wouldn't see that many battles in your life as a career soldier.

read the iliad

File: siegers_pic.png (55KB, 700x500px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 700x500px

Well, when it came down to it, you can imagine how a battle really was.
A big amount of levies and another part of professionals and knights.
It's as brutal as having people stabbing each other in close quarters can get.
Imagine a shitload of peasant levies getting hit by a huge wave of arrows.
I imagine it was really fucking gritty.

>>2553543
Game of Thrones - battle of the bastards.

Really realistic version of warfare kind off. Many soldiers were trampled, choked under piles of dead men rotting over a few days etc.
Youre right about linbs etc too.

Warfare was hardcore

File: 69 - ukQDWJx.jpg (421KB, 1062x741px)

421KB, 1062x741px

Antiquity was just as a gorey.

>>2553543
Any large scale close proximity organized battle with bladed weapons was brutal beyond reckoning. The difference between that and now was essentially the length of battle, modern battles having the fear and anticipation spread out over a longer period of time as well as a bigger distance.

>>2553633
You could just replace middle ages with history and this sentence would still be correct.

From the most ancient stone-age warfare up to but not including WW1, most deaths were from disease and malnourishment.

>>2553676
The battle of the bastards is more realistic than most hollywood shit but it is still not quite realistic at all.

File: 49 - lkErOJW.jpg (275KB, 759x630px)

275KB, 759x630px

Imagine the sound.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q0yz1s-7tig

is this historically accurate, /his/?

>>2553779
and the smell

File: Classical VS Medieval.jpg (227KB, 598x768px)

227KB, 598x768px

>>2553543
>Antiquities
-Battles involving tens and thousands of men in huge wars that build empires.
-No mediators.
>Medieval ages.
...glorified gang-fights between less than 10,000- or evern 5000, men, and then for some reason they can't conquer their fucking neighbors.
-Plenty of mediators ranging from the Church, noble families calling it off, muh chivalry & ransoming, etc.

>>2553796
>stabbing someone in the balls

Not cool dude. I don't care if it's war, men do not target the groins.

>>2553676
>send your cav first
>shoot your own cav
>massive pile of bodies that would have never happened with only a couple thousand dead, people don't just keep fighting on top of the pile it would be more spread out that whole sequence was contrived
>missile fire being portrayed as slaughtering men by the hundreds when in reality a volley of arrows would do only minimal damage to armored men
>nobody has shields for some reason except for the weird pike phalanx shield wall hybrid thing they had
>this tight formation of pikes and large shields outmaneuvers light infantry

it was pure hollywood fantasy. A total clusterfuck of men when in reality battles were far more organized and it wasn't just thousands of individual 1v1s like it was portrayed as with arrows randomly killing everyone.

Neither the cavalry, archers, nor infantry were portrayed historically, but I guess you can chalk this up to ramsay being the most unreasonably terrible field commander of all time.

File: Battle of Legnano.jpg (991KB, 2082x2923px)

991KB, 2082x2923px

>>2553825
To be fair, there were more professional soldiers in the Medieval Ages than in the Classical Ages.

>>2553543
Here's Lindybeiges video about the battle of Visby and how quite brutal it must have been.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kMrTi79D2Js

>>2554015
Here are the remains of the rebels:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HnL0wTKhCDU

>>2553543

>Medieval 1

Man, that brings back memories.

>>2554015
>>2554018
thats pseudohistory with no scholarly support to back it up

John keegan has a book called "the face of battle" which has a really interesting perspective on how Agincourt would have been.

File: Which faction bros.png (401KB, 800x600px)

401KB, 800x600px

>>2553543
>>2554054

>>2553779
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAWRWRA WRWRW AAARUAURAUR A
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA HELPG A AA AGAGGAG AGRGER

>>2554164

I can't believe something as simple and useful as telling you the starting units never made it past MTW 1.

>>2554185
Historical Campaigns also never made it past MTW.

The description of the 100 Years War is funny.

Apparently, the French threatened to cut off the fingers of captured longbowmen. That started a tradition where the English would wave their fingers around to taunt the French in the battlefield.

>>2553543
I got the impression the number of soldiers scaled down a bit in the middle ages compared to the massive armies seen in antiquity.

Also, in classical/roman times seems that lot more people were soldiers full time as opposed to conscripted peasants.

>>2553796
>those two guys half-assing their fight

I would do the same and wait until the battle was over.

File: Rename units.jpg (909KB, 1920x1029px) Image search: [Google]

909KB, 1920x1029px

>>2554185
They do it in Warhammer Total War. Some factions have different faction leaders you can choose: each with different abilities and starting units. You can rename units too

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ikUD2rG-rNI

This is my favorite battle scene of any movie.

Alexander's Gaugamela is also top notch.

>>2553825
The Norman Conquest of England hardly respected chivalry or any notions from the Church. After Hastings, the Normans and their mercenaries pillaged and raped all across southwestern England. This was done to isolate London as well as browbeat any potential resistance. Besides the thousands of Anglo-Saxons that died at Fulford Gate, Stamford Bridge, AND Hastings, thousands upon thousands of peasants were murdered and raped. Whole villages were razed.

Centuries later, the English would get their revenge in the 15th century when Normandy lost 3/4 of its population (which was about 1.5 million) from the devastation and looting that English soldiers inflicted.

Medieval battles may not conjure up as many troops and logistics as Ancient warfare, but it was no less brutal. The only reason chivalry was instituted was because knights were no better than thugs on horseback. A code of ethics was to rein in the savagery of the Middle Ages.

>>2554198
>Also, in classical/roman times seems that lot more people were soldiers full time as opposed to conscripted peasants.
The conscripted peasant thing is a meme, there were far more professional soldiers in the medieval period than in antiquity.

What was the most painful era of warfare?

Antiquity, Medieval, Pike&Shot, Musket, WW1, WW2, Modern?

Not in terms of damage or destruction, but just which inflicted the most agonizing pain on people.

>>2553633
>Most deaths and casualties for soldiers throughout the middle ages would have been from disease and supply issues.
Is there any source for this other than speculation?

>>2553685
>>2553697
>>2553779
>shouts and screams, flesh being rent, shields shattering, swords hitting armor like a blacksmith's forge, some rando mercenary pulls a shoulder strap over his intestines and keeps fighting, the enemy despite losing an eye and part of his cheek is still swinging like a madman
glorious
>>2553814
Iron and Copper then rotting dust, except there's no dust the smell is just that strong.

>>2554239
>these people trying to demonize invaders are telling the 100% complete and unbiased total truth
history is cucking you
take a fourth of what you said and it might be accurate.

>>2554164

Irish

File: 57 - n4YigoP.jpg (197KB, 1152x1008px) Image search: [Google]

197KB, 1152x1008px

>>2554286
I don't know what would be the loudest and most deafening, the screams or the clashes.

File: 64 - 12KgvoF.jpg (374KB, 1200x831px)

374KB, 1200x831px

Naval battles must've been a pretty sight.

File: 47 - eC4ZuZn.jpg (284KB, 1600x1093px)

284KB, 1600x1093px

I wish there were more images like these, gritty and realistic.

>>2554299
>3 Kerns, 1 Catholic Bishop, 1 Royal Bodyguard, 2 Irish Dartmen

A pure skirmisher army with a small force of melee troops... prolly the worst faction

>>2553676

Stop.

>>2554265
Pike and shot sounds the worst, you have a good chance of getting impaled by a giant spear or getting pelted with spheres of hot lead
Worst of both worlds I suppose

WWI would've been unbearably shitty as well

>>2554318
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jpGMSzgd8eg
Check this shit out.

>>2553685
>The guy in the foreground is most likely doing some kind of MJ forward-lean
Is this a JoJo reference??

>>2554171
Thought you were brap-posting there for a sec

File: batalladeplatea.jpg (762KB, 1600x900px)

762KB, 1600x900px

how would you handle this situation

>>2553671
>DUDE LORDS SENT UNTRAINED AND UNARMED PEASANTS INTO BATTLE LMAO

This was not a thing.

>>2554637
Turn 360 degrees and walk away

>>2554893
If you did that you'd go right back. Should've done a 180.

>>2554196
Uh, there are historical campaigns for Rome 2 and Medieval 2.

>>2554164

Any selection other than Picts is entirely plebitan.

>you cover the british isles in brown

>>2553758
The depiction of Gaugamela in Alexander was way more realistic than that trash, and it still fucked up a lot.

>>2553676
Bait

File: Why_7b9879_360581.png (5KB, 245x407px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 245x407px

>>2554897

not so fast

>>2553671
t. Someone who knows nothing about medieval warfare

File: Carolingian Cavaryman AD768-986-32.jpg (3MB, 3669x5037px)

3MB, 3669x5037px

>>2554001
>To be fair, there were more professional soldiers in the Medieval Ages than in the Classical Ages.
Nope.jpg

The Late Republican/Empire Roman legions were pros.
The Persian armies were pros
The Macedonians were phalangites were pros.

Their armies dwarfed anything Medieval European states ever fielded.

Meanwhile in the Medieval ages it takes a single village to field one cavalryman, hory shet.

>>2553667
t. Phillip Popadopaloupolis

>>2554897
newfag spotted
leader of red squad ready to engage
over

File: image.jpg (155KB, 800x790px)

155KB, 800x790px

>>2553543
For a lot of medieval to Renaissance Europe, war was literally a game. Nobles were just playing a big political chess game with one another. When Napolean started doing Napolean things, the nobility of Europe would write letters griping about how Napolean had totally ruined war with his "taking it seriously and playing to win" schtick

>>2554265
WW1, easily. The shellings, the trenches, the sanitation of said trenches, the jaw-dropping scale of death, the nerve gas... Just, everything about that war was fucking abhorrent.

>>2556703
This is probably the dumbest thing I've ever read on /his/ and that's saying something.

>>2553543
>those spearmen in the way of the knights so they don't get a charge bonus
noob

>>2556736
Well then maybe you should read a book, retard. The amount of knights that died in most warfare was nearly 0, it was a taboo to kill them, even if they were your enemy. You weren't supposed to kill anyone who surrendered. Besieging armies were expected to allow messengers to leave the cities to seek help.

>>2554267
yeah in both my mount and blade and total war saves I lost like all my soldiers to no bread and plague wtf

>>2554637
get mistaken for a persian due to my weird clothing and stabbed

>>2556782
Soldiers sometimes obeyed certain conventions of honor =/= "war was just a political chess game and nobody actually wanted to win wars until the 19th century"

>>2556782
That doesn't line up with what the earlier post said. The claim that "nobody actually tried to win wars until the Napoleonic era" is the stupidest fucking thing I've ever heard.

>>2553796
>marching so slowly into each other
yeah dude its just like my tw game

>>2554267
Recounts of many generals as well as famous historical examples such as the march to Moscow by Napoleon.

>>2556806
There's no point in sprinting into your opponent's lines from a mile away like most media shows, you'd just tire yourself out

File: 1488744456287.webm (612KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

612KB, 1280x720px

I imagine it was something like this

File: 1362378286221.png (19KB, 450x532px)

19KB, 450x532px

>>2556703
>Lose "chess game war"
>Pay massive ransom to get released
>Find out the victorious side has taken my ancestral home for their own
>Now have nothing except the clothes on my back
>Heh,good thing I wasn't playing to win, what kinda retard does that

>Lose battle
>invaders pillage my lands and destroy my property before leaving
>wow dude its just a game chill out
>now have no income for however long it takes to replace my peasant population, crops and various animals

>>2556804
>>2556798
>nitpicking and taking everything literally and acting like that's a refutation
Well Jesus, sorry for making generalizations to explain trends. I must have forgot my #notall at the end of the post.
http://www.historynet.com/napoleons-total-war.htm
Yes, I'd consider doing things like allowing a besieged city send messengers to call for backup "not playing to win". I never said "nobody before Napolean tried to win" I said that Europe in the centuries before that treated it much less seriously

>>2553957
> kind off. Many soldiers were trampled, choked under piles of dead men rotting over a few days etc.
Youre right about linbs etc too.

Reading helps.

>>2556817
thats what they did, especially romans

>>2556849
Except it was not a trend and its not true generally speaking, you are outright wrong.

People fucking died m8, if that isn't taking an issue seriously I don't know what is, the fact that the issue has come to war means its a serious issue.

Letting a messenger out of a besieged city could have just as many benefits for the attackers, it puts pressure on the defenders allies, the messenger could be discussing terms of surrender with their superior or just informing their superior that they're all going to starve to death and probably surrender soon.

>muh information on the attackers numbers

That's something anyone outside the besieged city could measure.

File: groda7.jpg (38KB, 445x325px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 445x325px

fuaaaark why did guns have to be invented?? war will never be epic again.

>>2554637
i'd just scream, stab and go forward. play it simple.

File: Faroese_stamp.jpg (47KB, 453x264px)

47KB, 453x264px

>>2554318
No escape. You fall in the sea, you drown. Nowhere to maneuver or retreat. When the ships clash, it's kill or be killed. Sea battles are some of the most ferocious stuff. The story of Ormurin Langi is a re-telling of an old viking battle which i highly recommend.

File: 66 - cvkYHrb.jpg (257KB, 1015x708px)

257KB, 1015x708px

>>2557089

Carthage: 1
Rome: 0

>>2557020
>implying the era of horse & musket wasn't the most epic war has ever been

File: Skutatoi.jpg (278KB, 1280x720px)

278KB, 1280x720px

>>2554959

*AHEM*

>>2556834

>That direct blow to the forehead with that thin ass stick
Black bloc leftist confirmed for born in the wrong era

>>2553543
war is war, m8. there's nothing romantic about it. just chaos and the most degenerate aspects of human nature. everywhere, now and always

>>2554286
autism