Was he the most powerful person in history with the most unlimited

Name me someone who was more powerful

fixed

File: image.jpg (22KB, 220x230px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 220x230px

>>2542239
My Mao........

>>2542256
This honestly

File: the-magnificent-portrait-of-edward-VII-by-arthur-stockdale-cope.jpg (55KB, 423x500px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 423x500px

>>2542239
we'd be typing in russian if that was true

the most powerful man must be english
emperor of the imperial federation, edward 7


pretty much leaves edward 7

>>2542259
Mao had more subjects but less power. In the period shortly after WWII Stalin exerted significant influence over a much larger portion of the globe and many more countries (including China itself) than Mao ever would. He also had a much larger economy and a much more powerful military at his disposal.

File: balcans.jpg (145KB, 807x605px) Image search: [Google]

145KB, 807x605px

>most unlimited power
>12 year olds still respond

>>2542239
Charles V of Spain.

>>2542269
Was he really more powerful? Didn't even he need popular support for stupid shit?

Stalin threw like 2 million Russians into the Finnish meatgrinder just because he could. He genocided millions of his own just because he could. Could Edward the 7th really get away with that shit?

>>2542256
>>2542259
He can't be more powerful, because Mao idolized Stalin, also Russia was far more developed with many more nukes, control of Eastern Europe and the possibility to conquer the rest of it in 4 weeks, better space exploration tech, more puppet states etc... etc...

Russia couldn't defeat USA but China did it twice:
in korea and in viet Nam
Long Live Mao - his ghost still rules most of Asia.