Dear /his/,
Though we sometimes have our problems with &humanities, there is no denying that we sometimes have prosperous debates about ontology, philosophy of the mind etc.
This is why today will be a good day. It's time for the ultimate philosophical debate. Today we're gonna prove our worth. We're gonna try to answer the one big philosophical question that dominates every single other question:
What is the endgame of life?
There is to this debate just 1 rule and I encourage everyone to ignore everyone who breaks this simple rule to not led us be lead astray. The rule is simple:
We presume that there is an endgame to life.
In practice: any argument containing "life is useless" or any form of this argumentation is, in this debate, automatically rejected.
Its whatever you want it to be
Life is just a game. The goal is survival. Not just eeking by with basic neccesities, but expanding and flourishing.
Also, all humans were put here by aliens and you have malevolent ghosts inhabiting your body desu
Read the Bible.
It explains the origins, purpose and endgame of mankind.
just b urself
>>2503078
bee cool
bee chill
bee comfy
Humanities need their own board.
We don't have the knowledge yet to fully understand what life's endgame is. However, the endgame of human life, or at least so it seems, is space exploration and colonisation
>>2503124
>the bible
Religion was a mistake
To live a good life according to human nature.
t. Aristotle
>>2505136
But what is human nature?
>>2503078
>We presume that there is an endgame to life.
>presuming facts not in evidence
Get the fuck out of here and take your stupid fucking thread with you.