Do you think that governments should be forced to seek approval

>>2489779

referendums should be reserved for the simplest most common sense problems.

What would end up happening is no tax referendum would end up passing and the government would subsequently collapse.

Yes, but you need to hold referendum first to see if a referendum is fair spending of taxpayer money.

No, because most people have small, shortsighted minds that would prefer a two-inch larger TV instead of high-quality roads. It's only when larger minds are given influence that meaningful change can take place. Tax by referendum is a one-way ticket to Africa-tier infrastructure outside of liberal areas.

>Do you think governments should use mob rule when it comes to the most important questions in politics?

No.

>>2489779
Referendums are only for moral or essentially meaningless issues

>>2489779
Should landlords seek approval of tenants for changes to rent? Fuck off commie.

File: il_fullxfull.762412812_ccx3.jpg (17KB, 570x570px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 570x570px

If you want to measure stupidity of your citizens, just call for referendum concerning two questions:

>Should taxes be abolished? Y/N
>Should social security fund be higher? Y/N

File: Alaskan Bait License.png (2KB, 250x54px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 250x54px

>>2491125
>1. Yes
>2. No, should be at 0

>>2490197
Sounds great