With the amount of controversy that it brings, is there anything

Finding an organ donor when you need a transplantation.

>>2463459
Is that really something which happens often?

>>2463455
In a racially polarized society like USA or South Africa a mixed kid could end up getting despised by everyone, not fitting in anywhere.
In a sane country, can't think of much

>>2463455
I live in Argentina, Tierra del Fuego for being exact
we have people from all skin tones and some afroamericans,nothing really happens.
It's all about the culture and laws than skin

>>2463464
As mixing becomes more common, it will increase.

Africans are more likely to have lower IQs and be more aggressive (i.e. criminals) so more of those genes means a worse society.

>>2463455
>Race mixing is communism
>Stop race mixing: March of the antichrist
Interesting perspectives those protesters had there

No, there's nothing wrong with it. Obviously in countries where racism is still a big deal, your children might have problems they wouldn't have if they were plainly one race or another, but that's more of a heckler's veto than any real argument against.

>Why is skub bad?
>Because I'll fucking kick your ass
Reproduce with whoever you love, doesn't matter what color they are.

>>2463639
>As mixing becomes more common, it will increase.
I meant how many times does it happen out of 10?

>>2463689
>Interesting perspectives those protesters had there
They were mostly indoctrinated (which we all are) from a young age about this desu.

I don't see anything wrong with it, really. I don't know that any race is inherently better than any other. Moreover, it can have some objective benefits. For example, it diversifies gene pools, which aids in preventing hereditary diseases as well as deformities. If you want an example of an isolated gene pool, you can look at purebred dogs. Or for a more human example, look at the British.

>>2463686
That's what Asians are for.

Depends on which races are mixing.

>>2463873
>it's a /pol/ack tries to justify his fetish for asian women episode

It causes conflict for no real gain.

>>2463455
Is there anything wrong with homo sapience mating with each other? No.

>>2463925
So fucking aborginals counts as bestiality then?

>>2463455
No.

>>2463455
There's nothing really wrong with it.

I'll be honest, I just find black people really unattractive, I don't want more of them and I don't like it when other races shit on their good genes when they mix with them.

>>2463939
Only if australians count as humans.

>>2463455
only when the poorest and dumbest of two races mix

>>2463689
>Obviously in countries where racism is still a big deal,
No country likes mix racing. At best some more desired groups might be okay but mixing in general is frowned upon because it produces instability and unfamiliarity.

>>2463455
We evolved to be in group creatures out of necessity for survival. On a subconscious level we look for someone with the same smell, taste etc that we and our family have. The fact that American White intermarriage is only at 7% despite an extensive propaganda campaign by the media to foster race mixing is only proof that people don't desire it.

File: One-Race_edited-1.png (334KB, 1000x944px) Image search: [Google]

334KB, 1000x944px

>>2463455
It should be desirable because of hybrid vigor and the fact that mixed race people are genetically superior to "purebred" peoples. Also once everyone is some vague shade of brown, then racism will no longer be a problem.

>>2463689
>Reproduce with whoever you love, doesn't matter what color they are.
or age

>>2464175
>despite an extensive propaganda campaign by the media to foster race mixing

>>2464193
>my white skin is what makes me unique

>>2464196
>alt-right babbys are pedos

Mmmm yes.

>>2463689
>Interesting perspectives those protesters had there
The "race mixing is communism" is a valid statement since communists are far more concerned with the destruction of "artificial" classes and race mixing would assist the destruction of two classes stratified by race as existed in the South at that time. It's not inherently communist, sure, but it's something that Communists of the era gave as a criticism of the United States as a whataboutism.

it's important not to race mix to ensure human biodiversity and the continued existence of ALL races.

>>2463455
no
>>2464388
human biodiversity can't disappear by having humans breed in whatever way
races as they are today have no value

if all the races mixed somehow, new individuals would still be born looking different

>>2464193
>hybrid vigor
no such thing
humans are too low in genetic diversity for that to exist

>>2463455
I don't think so. I'm skeptical of the supposed inferiority of certain groups, and even if this could be conclusively confirmed, mixing would equalize this.

>>2464555
Why would you want to equalize it?

>>2464326
You're almost there.

Something American communists pushed for since the 20s was "social equality" between blacks and whites. Until the Civil Rights movement, communists were the only political group demanding this.

The idea of social equality horrified many Southerners, because it implied race mixing. Anti-communists won the support of many poor Southern whites through racial appeals. If communists come to power and end Jim Crow, what next? Is your own daughter going to marry a Negro?

>>2464577
I feel like your reply piggy backs off of my own and doesn't add anything but further the consequence, but we'll go with it.

>>2464210
>skirting around the fact that it it exist

>>2464607
yeah dude remember beige power? nice try canada!

>>2464193
Mixed-breed kittens are usually less intelligent than pure breeds.

I'm torn on this issue. I don't want superior races mixing with blacks, but if there's no mixing, blacks are just going to breed with other blacks, perpetuating the problem. If we could control race mixing so as to breed out the inferior race, I'd be okay with it.

File: 1483532264717.png (104KB, 2000x2245px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 2000x2245px

>>2464648
>superior races
>plural
kk

>>2463473

This

Populations having been race-mixing since forever but with colonial nations where mestizo systems exist, there's going to be taboo against mixing.

>>2464670
indians are an example

>>2463455
As a mixed person, I'm fully against it. It denies a person any national or racial identity. It leads to people not being a part of any group ("too white to be black, too black to white") etc.

It does more harm than good.

>>2464663
Hispanic is some made up shit you donut

>>2464687
This guy is correct. It creates a rootless class of mongrels that nobody likes.

>>2464663
Did you make this for your graphic design class?

>>2464687


Racial identity is a meme.

Most white millennials didn't have much of a racial identity until it was Condecend into them by the hard left.

In the absence of oppression or opposition, people will want to self identify on an individual level

>>2464707
>Racial identity is a meme
Perhaps racial pride would be a better word.

But do explain why racial identity is a meme.

>>2464707
>millennials don't have a racial identity
That explains why millennials are the shittiest generation ever.

>>2464707
You can't not have an identity. If you do, one will be applied by outsiders to you for the purposes of marginalization and elimination.

The vacuum left by "There is no Canadian identity :^)" will be filled by another identity, and another group. In the case of Canada, it's the Chinese or Arabo-Islamic identity.

>>2464193
>racism will no longer be a problem.
Nigga please. Adjacent tribes in Africa, who look identical to anyone without years of study, have hated each other since the dawn of time. People will ALWAYS find a way to hate "the other".

>>2464193
In Haiti which is 100% nigger the lightest skinned niggers are considered to have higher status than the rest.

>>2463455
There is no controversy about race mixing among normal people famalam

>>2464741
And by normal people you mean American cuckolds

>>2464663
This graph is as legit as that one time I faked my moms signature in second grade

>>2464710
>>2464721
Not him but Racial Identity is akin to "we wuz" for anyone who follows it.
>I'M BLACK, WE WUZ KINGS OF EGYPT
>I'M WHITE, WE WUZ RULERS OF EUROPE
>I'M MEXICAN, WE WUZ AZTECS
>I'M CHINESE, WE INVENTED EVERYTHING FIRST
But you can't just take credit for the "cool" stuff that your ancestors did and forget that it all fell apart. It's the same level of arrogance and ignorance that you get when talking to an undergrad who endlessly brags about what they are going to do in the future when they aren't doing anything now.

>>2464725

The /pol/ fear mongering is noted.

However, that's because liberals have forgotten what they've stood for and don't want to take a hard stance on the non liberal parts of Islam. If they actually went ahead and said: "some parts of this book are morally reprehensible, while others are good" and promised to let in immigrant with good intentions who get it, while beating back those who don't, we wouldn't be having this problem.

What people like Merkel want to do is sell ragheads on the ideas of liberalism, get them addicted to McD's and HFCS. That's why they pussy out so much when a refugee commits a crime.

If they could learn to speak softly and carry two big guns, one for bigots on both either side, /pol/'s rapefugees crying would subside. But they're modern liberals.

If I'm gonna identify as something I'd rather it be on ideals, but it takes a thoroughly liberal society such that collectivism isn't forced on any racial group. Whites put it on blacks, Socjus put one on white millenials, threatened white millenials voted for the guy who didn't blame them for the world's problems.

Just need better liberals.

>>2464787
>le individualism meme

>>2463455
A lot of problems

1) Your child won't belong anywhere, except maybe somewhere like the US. They won't have a country or an identity, nor should they.
2) Contributes to the extinction and replacement of your nationality.
3) Extremely bad in evolutionary terms. Notice how it needs to be pushed so severely, and even still the overwhelming majority stick to their own race.

>>2464687
>getting national/racial identity from 2+ bloodlines
What is bad about this? If someone is hating, fuck'em.

>>2464796
individualism or racism

very hard choice

>>2464806
Individualism is nonsensical. You're always just a part of something bigger, you ARE your ancestors since everything from your looks to behavioral patterns is encoded in your DNA.

>>2464805
They aren't fully one of either, and groups should protect their own interests.
Race mixers are completely immoral and selfish people, even ignoring their open opposition to nature and to their own people.

>>2464787
This

>>2464752
>"People should be allowed to chose the circumstances of when and where and to whom they get married."

The only people who have a problem with this arrangement are permavirgins who think that they are entitled to a wife with pornstar-grade good looks and skinheads who want to appoint themselves "director of marital planning" and be the final arbiter in deciding who gets to marry who.

I'd like to point out that American is an exception and not indicative of most countries, so many posters here might not understand that most countries aren't multi-racial, they're ethnostates, homelands, etc.
Americans are a mix, so of course they're not going to understand this.

>>2464805
>getting national/racial identity from 2+ bloodlines
>as opposed to never losing it
???

>>2464828
The only people who DON'T have a problem with this are Americans and other race-mixed new worlders. In Europe, Asia and Africa it's still considered a big deal.

File: authoritarian_cuckold.png (468KB, 1000x1050px) Image search: [Google]

468KB, 1000x1050px

>>2464796

>>2464820
>encoded
You are influenced by your DNA, by habits. You can break them, overcome them.

>>2464820
humans are first individuals and then groups

that's our dna, autonomous individuals, not ants

>>2464832
This. Many Americans are utterly clueless.

>talk to an American
>get told Pittsburgh is some lilly white city
>look it up
>60% white 26% black
>mfw no face

>>2464828

Royals should not marry commoners, people cannot marry members of their own sex, you mustn't marry relatives, you cannot marry more than one person, etc.
Add to that "you cannot marry those of a different race".

>>2464843
You can't be an individual outside of a group, that just makes you a nobody.

>>2464843
Humans are social animals, we wouldn't be humans if left to ourselves. Have a human child raised by a wolf or something and he wouldn't even know how to speak a human language, how to use a computer or how to wipe his own ass. We flat out don't exist outside of the collective.

>>2464856
>>2464849
1 brain/human

>>2464832
>>2464839
>>2464847
Less than 7% of U.S. children are interracial compared to 10% in Britain. Americans aren't as open to interracial bullshit as /pol/ wants you to think.

>>2464847
Whoever told you Pittsburgh is white is fucking clueless.

>>2464865
>Less than 7% of U.S. children are interracial compared to 10% in Britain. Americans aren't as open to interracial bullshit as /pol/ wants you to think.
No, I was talking about the nature of the society.
I'm not talking about the current situation.
Britain consists of 3 nation states, each of which is monoethnic.

Even if you don't think america is multiracial, you must agree that it's multiethnic or of multiple nationalities.

>>2464839
>In Europe

File: Population_transfer.gif (71KB, 698x471px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 698x471px

>>2463455
>is there anything really wrong with the mixing of the races?

I'd ask where are the benefits that are claimed to come from the "mixing of the races"?

For decades now, we've been told that it's an established fact that ethnic diversity is good yet in all my 49 years, I have yet to see any evidence of that.

What I see, are that areas with mixed ethnic populations have FAR more problems then areas with homogenous populations and this is the case all the way from nations on down to individual towns.

Humans are instinctually very clannish; we prefer to be around those who are most like us and mixing different peoples, cultures, religions, etc. only leads to trouble.

>>2464839
>Europe
lolno. Just because right-wingers are having conniptions over crimes committed by refugees doesn't mean that people have a problem with a black guy marrying a white woman.
>Asia
Yeah, let's all follow China's example of family planning and then not get mad when there are 2 million more men than women because these are the kind of unforeseen consequences that happen when the government indulges in population planning
>Africa
yes, 3rd world shitholes are generally where you get people pushing these ideas in larger numbers than the odd lone quack or lonely angry young man

>>2464849
>Royals should not marry commoners
You should let Prince William know
>people cannot marry members of their own sex
Maybe in 3rd world shitholes. In the developed world this is a settled issue.
>you mustn't marry relatives
There're are actual medical and psychological reasons why people shouldn't
>you cannot marry more than one person
Exceptions can be made for people with sincerely held religious beliefs but the vast majority of people prefer single-partner parings.
>Add to that "you cannot marry those of a different race".
civilization is the process of setting man free from men.

>>2464897
You can't legitimately hold these opinions.
You're a child, either politically or actually.

>There're are actual medical and psychological reasons why people shouldn't
Extend that, and social and cultural, to everything else on the list.
These are not settled issues, these are issues that the ruling elite have forced on us.

>>2464897
Race mixing is considered taboo everywhere in Europe except for the biggest multiculti cesspits like London, Paris and Berlin. Try marrying a nigger in rural Italy and you'll get the shit beaten out of you. Try doing the same in Eastern Europe and it might as well be your funeral.

The "right wingers" you're describing are actually the average Europeans.

>>2464895
is why people who have different hair and eye colors shouldn't mix

>>2464883
>moving the goal posts
You claimed that Americans don't understand why racial homogeneity is good when Europeans have a higher rate of miscegenation than Americans do. That's false. Anything else you're trying to bullshit here is irrelevant. There's a reason our society is purposely stratified by race and class and your claims to the contrary are wrong.

>>2464920
The first mistake you did was thinking Brits are Europeans. They aren't, by their own admission.

>>2464920
I'm not moving the goalposts, this is what I meant from the start. I was not talking about modernity.

>>2464932
brits and arabs are the same race, so technically they are much less race mixed

>>2464895
stop confounding and mixing ethnicities and races, it's literally communism and possibly white genocide

>>2464937
Technically they're raxe mixing with Pakis and niggers rather than Arabs.

>>2464932
What about Italy? 13% of marriages are interracial. Is Italy not Europe? Of course it is (along with Britain), but you'll surely handwave it away because it doesn't fit your narrative.

>>2464934
Then it's even more wrong as interracial marriages were less taboo in Europe than in the United States since forever.

File: ima fuck all yall!.jpg (65KB, 716x464px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 716x464px

>>2464193
> It should be desirable because of hybrid vigor

Genetics is a two-way street. If you’re not carefully choosing your breeding partner, you’re just as liable to perpetuate undesirable genetic traits

>>2464914
>citation needed
The enormous number of mixed race Europeans suggests otherwise. Most people aren't as judgmental as you

>>2464966
>13% of marriages are interracial.
Source: your ass

>>2464962
aren't pakis technically caucasian too

though people there get really race mixed

>>2464975
Source: Second post, references Italian demographics from 2011 https://www.quora.com/How-common-are-interracial-relationships-in-Italy

>>2464978
>foreign = interracial
You cannot possibly be this stupid.

>>2464992
Read the entire post anon...

>>2464998
The graph only mentions relations with all foreigners, not interracial relations. And the rest of your "source" is literally a random unsourced post on an internet forum.

>>2464975
In 2011 the Census showed that almost one in 10 people in Britain were either married or living with someone from a different ethnic group
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/10943807/Love-across-the-divide-interracial-relationships-growing-in-Britain.html
>itt /pol/ find out how wrong they are about everything

>Olympic heroine Ennis was born in Sheffield in 1986 to a Jamaican father and English mother.

>At that time, a British Social Attitudes survey showed 50% of the public were against marriage across ethnic lines. The figure dropped to 40% in the 1990s and now stands at 15%.

>>2465025
>different ethnic group = different race

File: Big Three Races.jpg (1MB, 1500x1187px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1500x1187px

>>2464951
>stop confounding and mixing ethnicities and races

How about you stop trying to force your obsolete definitions on the conversation?

“Race” is simply to broad of a term, as it only encompasses the Big Three Races (white, black and yellow) and that’s not going to tell you much.

“Ethnicity” on the other hand, is a much more accurate term.

>>2465025
It's going to change or we're going to die out

>>2464865
->implying Black and Hispanic Americans don't jack that number up to at least 27%

If your race is either 20-25% white on average, or if your """"race"""" comprises of mostly mestizos and mulattos, you're mixed race.

>>2465041
Apologies for mixing up my Neo-Nazi pseudoscience
>>2465055
>It's going to change or we're going to die out
The opposite dude. You know how babies are made right?

>>2464976
Yep, Pakis are basically white Indians.

>>2464728
Bad post. Ethnic relationships and ties HAVE ALWAYS CHANGED THROUGH OUT THE ages. Africa isn't some continent that never changed and this view is a leftover of previous views held during the colonial Era.

>>2465071
Are you daft? How can you say something so stupid?
Would mixing races preserve your race? No.
Will mixing ethnicities preserve your ethnicity?

File: global-genetic-distances-map.jpg (856KB, 3741x3887px) Image search: [Google]

856KB, 3741x3887px

>>2465042
Race is a much more objective cathegory than ethnicity. At least white race.

>>2465090
Your image does not support your statement

>>2465042
>posting a heavily inaccurate picture

Why would Horner Africans not be mixed race? And why include the Southern races of South Asia, Southeast Asia, and Australia as black, when they couldn't be further from black people? Also, why is most of North Europe "Asian"?

People really didn't know shit about genetics back then, did they?

>>2465102
Look at the tight European cluster.

>>2465090
Can you explain this to me?

>>2465107
Which relatively speaking is also tightly clustered with Middle Eastern and Indian peoples. If anything this supports the idea that race is a continuum, not a number of rigidly bounded groups.

>>2465111
It's literally explained on the picture itself.

File: BlackWhiteGeese.jpg (276KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

276KB, 1024x768px

>>2464915
>
> is why people who have different hair and eye colors shouldn't mix

Beyond the ascetic value of non-black hair / non-brown eyes, I don’t know of any genetic issues?

>>2465118
That's like saying that because there exist hermaphrodites, that we shouldn't have male and female bathrooms

>>2463455
Yes. It leaves your kids volunerable to a whole host of new diseases. And if it's with blacks it will reduce your kids cranial capacity, amount of grey/white matter, and the number of cortical neuron connections they have.

>>2465136
no genetic issues with a smart black/asian/whatever guy and a white woman having a kid

genetic issues with a stupid white woman and a smart white guy

conclusion:
race mixing isn't the problem

>>2465141
Explain

>>2465163
>no genetic issues with a smart black/asian/whatever guy and a white woman having a kid
Do you actually believe that?

>>2465167
Just because there exist individuals which are on the edges, does not mean that the groups must be thrown away.

>>2465173
analogies are for kids in high school to grasp concepts, not for argumentation

>>2463455
Does it really bring a lot of controversy?
Most Americans in polls don't care about race mixing and interracial marriage.
It seems like its only a big thing on /pol/.

>>2465173
In a continuum, there are no edges or groups. And the image you posted shows that Middle Eastern and Indian people should be regarded as part of the same group as Europeans, and that East Africans are closer to this group than they are to other niggers.

>120 replies
>no mention of sickle cell
Is this why everyone laughs at /his/?

>>2465198
Yes, you and the rest of the liberals with your modern ideas of multiracialism are kids, your ideas are new and already proven wrong, and you need to be taught the concept of an in-group.

File: laughing primates.jpg (181KB, 736x490px) Image search: [Google]

181KB, 736x490px

>>2465090
> Race is a much more objective cathegory than ethnicity.
> promptly sub-divides races into ethnicities..

>>2465215
but you just said genders are races

File: genetic disorders.jpg (139KB, 728x546px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 728x546px

>>2465163
>conclusion:

Evolution doesn't stop at the neck.

>>2465061
These groups don't generally mix so I don't know what your major malfunction is.

>>2465231
Your inability to abstract and understand is partly due to the failures of modern education, but not something for which you shouldn't still be blamed

>>2465173
It does if literally everyone is "on the edges"

>>2465245
Your analogy was weak because it only works if someone already accepts your premise that race is analogous to gender.

>>2465260
My analogy was about groups themselves

>>2465088
So whats the plan anon? Do we all have to stop doing it in the front hole until the demographics of Europe are at a state you deem suitable?

>>2465152
If mixed race kids are so vulnerable to 'new diseases' and have reduced 'cranial capacity' explain why Obama is healthy and tell me about these new diseases.

>>2465285
No, we need to do away with all of the tenants of modern liberalism.
Bring back the family, do away with feminism - birth control, abortion and career women.
That alone will cause the birth rate to sky rocket (the UN are introducing birth control to africa as a population control measure), back to reasonable levels.
Get rid of internationalist nonsense and put your own people first in their country.

>>2465276
But you haven't proved the races are really groups like sexes are

>>2465239
explain to me why a smart white person and a stupid white person breeding together isn't dysgenics

>>2465312
But you haven't proved sexes are really groups like races are

>>2465316
If it's the only alternative to race mixing.

>>2465320
>if
kek
ok

>>2465286
They were posted in the thread. Sickle cell being one of them.
I don't have access to Obamas health records so I can't tell you.

>>2465318
Very weak response, try again

>>2465351
But you haven't proved "weak responses" is really a group. It's very subjective and most posts are on the edge. Therefore the entire thing must, by your logic, be meaningless and useless.

>>2465344
you don't need to have obama's health records
his mom is some slut and his dad a nobody from kenya
he is a professor, trump is a brainlet with a bachelor's

trump's wife is first year dropout from a liberal arts uni in eastern europe

poor little baron, some genes he got

>>2465301
Does putting 'your own people first in their own country' apply to all citizens who were born in the country(regardess of race) or only to white citizens who were born in the country?

>>2465152
>And if it's with blacks it will reduce your kids cranial capacity, amount of grey/white matter, and the number of cortical neuron connections they have.

Then why are there so many smart half black half white people out there? Some racists try to claim that the reason why any black Americans are smart is because of white genetics, like Neil Degrasse Tyson.

>>2465370
do you have to ask

white people have had enough, we need to strike back and stop being nice - deportation or genocide, your choice

>>2465362
How don't I need his health records to tell you about any health problems he has?
And the rest of your post was a non sequitur

>>2465361
That makes sense. I guess the category of "weak responses", like that of race, is meaningless and useless. Glad we are agreed

>>2465362
>>2465362
How don't I need his health records to tell you about any health problems he has?
And the rest of your post was a non sequitur

>>2465370
>citizens

>>2465377
blacks in america are all 25% white
literally non-argument
>>2465384
>>2465380
>was a non sequitur
you wish

>>2465241
I'm not saying that they mix a lot, I'm saying that they ARE mixed you idiot. Are you trying to tell me that someone like Beyonce or Rosie Perez doesn't have white admixture? Hell, even Don Cheadle does (though not as much obviously), and he looks "pure" West African.

File: 5716496684144777473.jpeg___1_500_1_500_cb94de6a_.png.jpg (36KB, 404x306px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 404x306px

>>2465316
>explain to me why a smart white person and a stupid white person breeding together isn't dysgenics

It is; stupid is stupid.

The issue is how common stupidity and other genetic traits are within a particular ethnic group and just as there are quantifiable genetic physical difference between ethnic groups, there are also genetic differences in intelligence.

>>2465074
My point is that people will always find something to hate each other about. Once everyone is the same shade of brown, people will come up with something else to discriminate by.

>>2465377
Reduced capacity doesn't mean stupid or retarded, it means reduced capacity.

>>2465320
Whites are already mixed race, are you sure about that?

http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2015/04/how-europeans-evolved-white-skin

http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-29213892

>>2465301
>>2465379
Why?
I'm serious. What's the point? What would we gain from this?

>>2465400
>the issue is actually race, we are going to use it to determine your intelligence

>>2465410
Everybody is mixed you twit. That doesn't mean Swedes or Italians should breed with Blacks. They shouldn't by all accounts.

>>2465415
stop the white genocide

>>2465419
>by all accounts.
by your accounts

>>2465410
What?

So now distinct species don't exist because they're evolved from common ancestors?

Believing in multiracialism = not believing in evolution

>>2465415
Preserving your people?

>>2465415
I don't know about all his other points, but lack-of-family is a huge factor in crime. Some ridiculously high percentage of convicts were raised by single mothers. Single-motherhood is a huge problem.

>>2465429
caucasians aren't a distinct species

>>2465404
Reduced capacity as in brain size? Because if that's so, then human brains have been shrinking for the past 20,000 years. Earlier members of our species (Omo 1 from Africa, Cro-Magnons from Europe) have larger brains than the current populations that live there today.

If not, then my mistake.

>>2465436
TOPKEK
Yeah forensics can't differentiate a caucasian from an African lmfao.

>>2465436
No, races are sub-species

>>2465421
>>2465429
Oh you think I should have some sort of racial consciousness instead of treating people as I find them.
I don't want to do that. Nor do I want to kill my mixed-race kids. No doubt you will deal with me on the day of the rope.

>>2465379
This is why there are issues between races.. the hypocrisy on both sides.

There is a third option: fight back against the clown who is stupid enough to try genocide.

>>2465385
A black person who was born in this country and whose family has been in this country since slavery is a citizen.

>>2465445
No, you should have a national consciousness.
>Mixed-race kids
You're a shitty father.

File: 1432395575693.jpg (49KB, 456x748px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 456x748px

>>2465377
>Neil Degrasse Tyson.
>smart

>>2465440
Yes but cro-magnons are not homo sapiens.

>>2465450
I'm not american and don't care for discussions about america

The people who've been allowed into Britain since 1948 are not British and never will be. Not even 5th generation immigrants. Even the Jewish communities here aren't British and they've been here since the 1600s or something when Cromwell let them back in.

File: 1481989094490.jpg (83KB, 782x1080px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 782x1080px

>>2465450
>fight back against the clown who is stupid enough to try genocide.

>>2465443
they can, doesn't mean those are different species
>>2465444
lol, you wish
humans are extremely bottlenecked compared to most species

>>2465434
Crime is falling across the West.
>>2465452
>No, you should have a national consciousness.
Again why?
>>Mixed-race kids
>You're a shitty father.
How does that follow? Why would it make a difference?

File: 8623ec5cf2a5af86f9063a26a4a47fa4.jpg (34KB, 600x400px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 600x400px

>>2465416
>the issue is actually race, we are going to use it to determine your intelligence

No, you have it backwards; determining intelligence shows there are genetic differences in different ethnic groups.

>>2465469
>Again why?
In-group preference is a foundational concept.

>How does that follow? Why would it make a difference?
Look at the rest of the thread.

>>2465469
>Crime is falling across the West.
And? You're telling me single-motherhood is NOT a major factor in why kids get raised to be shitty adults?

>>2465429
>distinct species

Are you fucking stupid? That's not what I meant at all. What I'm saying is that Europeans descend from three separate racial populations (especially the dark skinned West/Central/South natives who arrived 40,000 years ago) that merged into a mostly homogenous race, at least when compared to Africans and Asians, and Aboriginals.

>>2465419
South Europeans already have a higher admixture of North and Sub-Saharan African genetics than the majority of Europe (it's small but it's still there). What about Ethiopians? As a mixed people who range from 30 to 50% Caucasian (West Asia and North Africa), should they have a better chance than say, some Nigerian immigrant? What about Arabs? They're Caucasian as well. What is the line for you?

>>2463499
Ushuaia?

File: minorities_britain.jpg (44KB, 620x381px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 620x381px

>>2465471
being against race mixing doesn't follow from that, even if it were a fact

face it, for you and your kin race is more important than intelligence, you have to accept who you are

File: chihuahua-and-great-dane.jpg (58KB, 1047x775px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 1047x775px

>>2465464
>they can, doesn't mean those are different species

It means the terminology we're using (and the social/political effects that result from it) is inaccurate.

Everybody is NOT equal, as much as we'd like that to be.

>>2465469
>Crime is falling across the West.
As we see so many things decriminalised, and as we see huge unsustainable states.

>>2465493
Yes, and that three merged into one does not mean that that one should merge with others.

>>2465458
t.i'm against multiculturalism, but also against assimilation, brown people make me feel bad
check this >>2465501 out

>>2464326
>"race mixing is communism" is a valid statement
>It's not inherently communist
nice opinions

>>2465479
You aren't making much of an argument here.
Who is my in group? Not my own family?

I have much less in common with idiots of my own race than with graduates and fellow professionals from others. Why should I have solidarity with provincial nitwits like you?

File: Chisala-7.png (70KB, 546x430px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 546x430px

>>2465504
>low human genetic diversity is inaccurate and we should use 19th century race science
i agree, people aren't created equal

rate these dog breeds for me, it's pups

>>2465501
>>2465506
Our government is failing our people.

>>2465521
This is what happens when you add multiracialism and liberalism and diversity pushes. You destroy the native population.

>>2465456
They literally are. Cro-Mag does not equal Neanderthal.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cro-Magnon

>>2465453
t. Ken Ham

But seriously, he's the best example for "W-well he doesn't count because he's light skinned and therefore 30% white!" that I've seen around here. I picked him because whenever people think of "black science man", they think of him, mainly because he's shown a lot.

>>2465524
t. brainlet
what do your parent do, m80

>>2465531
oh, are you an environmentalist now

intelligence is genetic, remember

>>2465517
this is not about you
you are liter human garbage polluting society

>>2465539
Those aren't IQ tests, we aren't accepting the average person from other countries, environmental factors (THE WELFARE STATE) can influence genetics SIGNIFICANTLY.
I don't give a damn who's more intelligent, I value my own people and my own culture. If they were so intelligent, they would have conquered us, we wouldn't have lost by having traitors open our gates on behalf of a certain group.

>>2465564
>environmental factors (THE WELFARE STATE) can influence genetics SIGNIFICANTLY
By this, I mean that welfare is incredibly dysgenic and in a few generations can lower IQ of the population.
Of course parts of IQ are environmental, but a small portion.

We've also seen the complete collapse of our aristocracy.
Welfare is effectively a selective pressure to be less intelligent

File: QdfpBdW.png (46KB, 500x493px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 500x493px

>>2465501
>face it, for you and your kin race is more important than intelligence, you have to accept who you are

Ethnicity absolutely plays a part in intelligence and overall success.

As an ethnic European, it makes sense for me to breed with other Europeans (the most successful ethnic group on the planet, by a long shot) or if I’m looking to specifically bump intelligence, East Asians or Euro-Jews.

>>2465504
Comparing dogs to humans is foolish. Yes, we aren't equal, but there aren't any humans who are the equivalent to a Chihuahua and a Great Dane. Well, there aren't any alive that is. Homo erectus had full grown adults who were 4 feet tall in some subspecies (yep, I said subspecies, as they actually had some), to 8 year old children who were 6 feet tall. There's even a subspecies called Meganthropus that might have reached 7-8 feet.

>>2465505
You didn't answer my last couple of questions.

>>2465588
Which ones? I was only replying to the part that replied to me, though I did respond to another part of a post (crime is falling) who replied to someone else.

>>2465564
>we aren't accepting the average person from other countries
who is in their original countries doesn't matter, you are either (genetically) smart or not

value your people, but when you see a minority remember they are on average better than you, ok?

>>2465531
By native, do you mean British or European? I sure hope you don't mean the latter.

File: 228395_10150187157218335_90930738334_7022160_2286010_n.jpg (88KB, 720x540px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 720x540px

>>2465578
>Comparing dogs to humans is foolish.

Claiming all ethnic groups are equally intelligent for politically correct reasons despite scientific evidence otherwise, is foolish.

File: wewuzashkenazi.png (283KB, 1024x819px) Image search: [Google]

283KB, 1024x819px

>>2465576
>Euro-Jews.
my favorite meme
https://www.ucl.ac.uk/tcga/tcgapdf/Nebel-HG-00-IPArabs.pdf

you are delusional

>>2465554
And yet if the shit storm comes me and my fellow metropolitan professionals, and our families, will be well protected in our gated communities and our secure, highly paid jobs, while all you ill-educated provincials will have to fight it out with immigrants far more hardworking and ruthless than yourselves.

Don't you sometimes wish you had tried harder at school

>>2465605
groups can't be smart or stupid, persons can

this is the explanation behind>>2465501

immigrant persons are smarter on average than white brits, due to natural selection

if you were right, then that chart would be impossible

i know what you meant, but make sure you say correct things next time

>>2465564
>If they were so intelligent, they would have conquered us, we wouldn't have lost by having traitors open our gates on behalf of a certain group.

What country are you from? Because there's a good chance you were conquered if you're European (via other Europeans mind you, except the culture who got KHAN'd), only to assimilate and start a new culture later on.

>>2465603
I mean the people who established these countries and _possibly_ the Normans

>>2465600
What? I value my own people and consider them superior
Who doesn't?

>>2465624
Yes, and at no point was it reasonable for them to lay down their arms and let it happen.

>>2465605
>Yes, we aren't equal

Did you just ignore this? Reading comprehension is key.

>>2465595
I had asked you where was the line for you. Start with me asking you about Ethiopians in the previous comment.

File: 1487258292303-1.jpg (419KB, 1366x610px) Image search: [Google]

419KB, 1366x610px

>>2465619
How are immigrants smarter? I sure hope you arnt going to say "because they get into university at a higher rate" unironically. If you do you might be a retard that doesn't know about affirmative action.

>>2465637
I don't believe solely in race alone
Should more caucasion groups have a BETTER chance? Yes
Should non British groups have ANY chance? No, or virtually none

>>2465631
>What? I value my own people and consider them superior
>Who doesn't?
/pol/ doesn't
according to their own race science the billions of east asians are superior

>>2465645
>uk
>affirmative action
join reality please

>>2465631
>Who doesn't?

Many people actually. Or at the very least, not when it comes to race and ethnicity. I'll give you nationality though. For example, there are many Americans who think we're the greatest country in the world and want to protect America first. The majority of them are not racist or even that xenophobic compared to other countries.

>>2465654
That's only because liberalism infests the west and has caused so much damage to our society

File: mumbai slum.jpg (220KB, 900x598px) Image search: [Google]

220KB, 900x598px

>>2465619
>this is the explanation behind>>2465501

And yet India is a certifiable shithole, so clearly the limited scope of British school exams isn't telling us the whole story.

>>2465651
>he thinks IQ is everything
Its not. A mix of culture and IQ is.

>>2465653
>>2465645
If anything, there's recent "affirmitve action" FOR native British students these days.

>>2465650
So you're sort of a "Britain for the British" person right? There's nothing inherently wrong about that part I guess. National pride is in all countries.

>>2465671
the scope is enough to tell us about immigrants in britian
>>2465674
asians have bigger brains if you adjust for body size
don't kid yourself
>>2465677
is that why year after year east asians and indians outperform natives

>>2465677
>If anything, there's recent "affirmitve action" FOR native British students these days.
There were one or two specific cases.
ALL OF THE AFFIRMATIVE ACTION SHOULD BE FOR THE BRITISH

IT'S OUR COUNTRY, NOT A CHARITY AND HOTEL

>>2463455
There's literally nothing wrong with it. Only conservatards who, with their twisted logic, rationalize their racism are able to find a reason for it to be wrong.

>>2465694
You don't value the preservation of your race?

File: noAA.jpg (38KB, 590x329px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 590x329px

>>2465691
>I WANT AA
can't say I blame you

>>2465615
wishful thinking

>>2465710
No, I want the entire welfare state to go, in fact it would be ok if the ENTIRE state collapsed, provided we got our demographics back first.

>>2465717
Obviously ignoring the very real threat of being conquered by someone who wills our replacement

>>2465674
Culture reflects IQ

All this genetic bullshit is so much overexaggarated, social factors are way more important. Think of a black guy with excellent upbringing and education and compare him to your average English football hooligan. Which one of them would you consider more civilized?

>>2464600
It reverses the order of the argument, which is important.

>>2465724
>Think of a black guy with excellent upbringing and education and compare him to your average English football hooligan. Which one of them would you consider more civilized?
The English hooligan.

Wasn't there a study somewhere showing that crime was more prevalent among a high black socioeconomic class than it was among a much lower white socioeconomic class?
oh but >muh magic racism

>>2465717
k, brainlet

>>2465724
idk you're providing some fantasy scenario

>>2465728
>money is the same as upbringing

>>2465731
How does any of this make you a brainlet?

>>2465724
Hooligan. Black NFL players are all college educated and they're also fucking rerards on crack.

>>2465735
very strong correlation

>>2465736
>>2465710
>>2465521
>>2465501
i am white working class british and my parents are too
it is what it is

>>2465749
>white British
You could just say "British"

>>2465748
ok, how strong

>>2465754
Stronger than you, manbrainlet

>>2465686
>is that why year after year east asians and indians outperform natives

Don't forget Christian West Africans. And I never said it worked :^)

>>2463455
Wrong in what sense?

It lowers diversity, destroys thousands of years of evolution, is in conflict with seemingly instinctual preferences of human beings to divide themselves into groups, and a lot of other things, but is this wrong? People are doing what people do, fuck and make more people. That is the purpose of life, how could it be wrong to do that?

>>2465741
Bullshit. They got into unis because of their sport achievements and not because of their grads.

>>2465776
You fuck and make more of your own people, you try to preserve your genes, you don't throw them away

>>2465776
>but is this wrong?
it's wrong when you mandate that x has kids with y, whatever races they have

it doesn't lower diversity
genes get passed on to the next generation, people will still be born different
if you imagine only semi brown mexican looking people existing, then you are quite wrong

>>2465783
They still have college education.

>>2465735
This anon is right. Money in itself doesn't guarantee good upbringing.

>>2465796
Are you saying that blacks can't raise kids properly?

>>2465786
So you are against conquering armies raping the women of the men they defeated then?

>>2465790
>it doesn't lower diversity

Yes it does. Instead of two distinct groups you have one blend of both which is really neither. They become culturally and genetically stateless people.

>>2465813
>So you are against conquering armies raping the women of the men they defeated then?
I am, but that's a different matter, there is a difference between the two sexes. If a white man fucks a black girl and leaves her, and she has a half black/white baby, that's *good, relatively speaking (in this tribal context), while if a woman does it, it isn't, because of the differences between men and women. In fact you could just put it down to "the difference between raping and being raped".


*there is actually another problem, which is that if they appear to look white, then their genes will be mixed further into the population

>>2465823
by "different matter" I mean the reasons I am opposed to it are not solely genetic or racial

>>2465823
And obviously for black people, it's the reverse.

>>2465791
It's most likely too late then since they too old. What I meant by good education and upbringing is a loving and dependable family, ethical values, encouraging critical thinking from childhood and list goes on.

File: muslamic1[1].jpg (14KB, 400x256px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 400x256px

>all these butthurt white brits in this thread
You've lost kids. Immigration will continue, demographics will continue to change. You will spend your old age living next to Muslims. The children of the immigrants will out-perform yours at school and become the new middle class.
Your fantasy all white nation is never going to be realised. You are a dying breed of morons who won't be missed.

File: 1487258270615.jpg (28KB, 536x392px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 536x392px

>>2465728
Yep

>>2465813
>genetically stateless
?
they can be neither, doesn't mean genetic diversity is lowered for reasons that are very obvious
genetic diversity is reduced when genes disappear

but i'm guessing you mean sjw definition diversity

>>2465806
The opposite. Are you retarded?

>>2465840
No, I'm not.

>>2465832
Over 70% of British Muslims are inbred. They most certainly are not smarter than your average brit, and neither is any ethnic group besides asians.

>>2465823
So you are against it, but not if it's a white guy and a black woman?

>>2465834
I mean there is no large group of people who will share their genetics anywhere near them they can associate with.

Genetic diversity is lowered by the fact that two divergent evolutionary chains are combined back into one.

>>2465847
proof to the contrary is in this very thread
read the thread

>>2465833
Wow Asians really are the master race. A middle class Asian has the same murder rates as an upper class White. Even lowest class Asians are better than middle class Whites.

>>2465832
The average arab is way more smarter than the average English guy to be honest. In London Pakis dress more fashionable and look happier than the fat proles.

>>2465853
>So you are against it, but not if it's a white guy and a black woman?
No, I'm against it entirely.
I'm saying that on a purely genetic and racial basis, it's ok to have your men raping foreign women and leaving ... going back home, and taking a native woman as their wife.

>>2465860
With no chaos in a society it stagnates. Too much and it is too chaotic to do anything in.

>>2465847
Smarter than you probably
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-35958498

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/10688017/White-British-adults-less-qualified-than-ethnic-minorities.html

>>2465853
>>2465875
But, as I say, I have other reasons to be opposed to it, i.e. moral reasons

>>2465875
>No, I'm against it entirely.
> it's ok to have your men raping foreign women and leaving

...anon

>>2465882
I know you can read, you're just denying it because you know the truth doesn't agree with you. You're denying it for solely political cause - can't oppose the immortal science of the party of the vanguard for the masses!

>>2465853
>two divergent evolutionary chains
clines
but ok, i'm guessing indians, mexicans, peruvians and "black" brazilians should hate their immoral existence

genetic diversity isn't lowered, since the same genes are around
sjw diversity is lowered (not even that, since diverse looking people will still be born in very frequent significant numbers)

but ok, have pride in your race, and be happy

>>2465878
>this kills the British

File: obama_laughing_[1].jpg (30KB, 512x422px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 512x422px

>>2465878
>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/10688017/White-British-adults-less-qualified-than-ethnic-minorities.html

>Overall, 26 per cent of white British adults held a degree, compared with 40 per cent of those described as Black African, 42 per cent of Indians and 43 per cent from Chinese backgrounds.

>40 per cent of those described as Black African

Snaggletooth Brits literally getting BTFO by niggers straight from Africa.

>>2465891
You are contradicting yourself in back to back sentences.

I don't care about your reasoning, it's the historical reasoning of most people through all of human history but be clear on your position.

>>2465903
no it doesn't
i really am asking myself how they do it

is britain different from sweden?
is the concept of britain different?
or are the immigrants different

or are those reports true, but misrepresent the immigrants in britain, i know london is majority immigrants or brown brits

>>2465923
No I'm not, I told you explicitly what I believed.

I told you that I am opposed to it, but that RACIALLY AND ETHNICALLY it is ok. MORALLY it is wrong.

>>2465923
>>2465938
And of course it would be RACIALLY AND ETHNICALLY WRONG if you actually married them, rather than raped them. (And morally wrong, but for different reasons)

>>2465899
>genetic diversity isn't lowered, since the same genes are around

No anon, for example if we take all of Finland and breed them with all Australian Aborigines you do not end up with greater diversity. You end up back at their last common ancestor.

You lose the specialization of both races from their thousands of years of divergent evolution.

>>2465947
>you do not end up with greater diversity.
you do
there is no outbreeding depression in humans, nor is there "hybrid vigor" - simply because our evolutionary history is very simple and human diversity is low due to a bottleneck many years ago

also you aren't making an argument against race mixing there, you are making an argument against mixing with muh aboriginals

>>2465938
>No, I'm against it entirely.

to

>RACIALLY AND ETHNICALLY it is ok. MORALLY it is wrong.

Can you see why I am confused about what you are staying anon?

>>2465968
That EYE am against it entirely does not mean that there are NO REASONS by which it could be justified. Now are you going to continue this charade, or actually address what was said?

>>2465878
Degrees = intelligence? LMFAO
AA and nigs getting into schools for sports has been discussed.
Also nice unbiased sources, its not like the UK media is doing everything in its power to portray non-whites as humans, kek

>>2465947
If we take all of Finland and breed them with Mongols... oh...

>>2465977
>AA in UK

Read the thread next time before you embarrass yourself.

>>2465961
The argument has already been made 100 times in this thread. Just look at genetic disorders that certain races get that others don't. When you mix the offspring has a chance of getting any genetic order it's parents may be susceptible to.

>>2465961
The argument is that race mixing does in fact lower genetic diversity in humans.

You simply stating "you do" and essentially claiming their is no significant diversity to begin with is not refuting my point. You are actually agreeing but saying the loss of diversity is low and the offspring will neither be better or worse off than their parents.

Maybe you want to call me a sjw again?

>>2465986
>When you mix the offspring has a chance of getting any genetic order it's parents may be susceptible to.
lol, of course not
a race mixed kid is protected from both sickle cell anemia and something like cystic fibrosis which is common to caucasians
>>2465993
>You simply stating "you do" and essentially claiming their is no significant diversity to begin with is not refuting my point.
but that's not what i'm saying
what the fuck man, what's so hard to understand
genetic diversity is the amount of genes in a gene pool, unless you remove genes from it it doesn't decrease
what's so hard to understand

>>2465983
Way to adress half the post fag.
Why is the average iq in India 82 but the average iq in the UK is 100?it's almost as if the UK picks the best immigrants to come. Too bad their kids can't compete and deviate towards the mean Indian iq of around 82.

>>2465975
>or actually address what was said?

How can I? You contradict yourself on the subject so you may as well argue it out within your own head and come back when you have worked out your position.

You are also spelling I as EYE so I am thinking this is a waste of my time.

>>2466003
Just because sickle cell is a recessive gene doesn't mean the kid won't have it. Are you retarded?

>>2466005
>Too bad their kids can't compete and deviate towards the mean Indian iq of around 82.
And that's where you are wrong.
Here, I'll collect the posts Anons have made for you. Please do not try to bend reality further.
>>2465878
>>2465710
>>2465521
>>2465501
Smart people have smart kids, race here is irrelevant. BECAUSE intelligence is genetic, you either have it or you don't.

>>2465982
Evolution is a bitch if you're not the fittest.

The Fins were just an example of the whitest blondest nation I could think of for the sake of argument. It was a toss up between Somolians and Abbos for the other side.

>>2466015
you will have the gene, you won't have the disease

>>2466018
You're stupid.heres someone trying to explain away the deviation in iq that occurs. You can try to explain it but you can't deny it exists.
http://humanvarieties.org/2013/04/18/iq-regression-to-the-mean-the-genetic-prediction-vindicated/

>>2466018
>race here is irrelevant. BECAUSE intelligence is genetic

Do you have any idea how idiotic that statement is?

Are you inferring that race and genetics are not related?

>>2466028
Wrong.
https://www.google.ca/amp/www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/hidden-black-ancestry-linked-to-rise-in-sickle-cell-blood-disorder-738008.html%3Famp

>>2466024
>Somolians and Abbos for the other side.

I would say they would look like Papua New Guineans.

>>2466036
Regression to the mean exists, just not for individuals. It's simple. You have an iq of 110, today you score 120, but the more tests you take, you will "regress" to your score of 110. The term "regression" doesn't necessarily mean the reverse of progress as the example with "Linear regression". Google that too. As far as groups are concerned it's that the more people you sample, they'll tend to a score of 100, even if you sampled outliers at first.
A smart person has smart kids. Period. This is consistent with second gen immigrants outperforming natives also. As shown in the charts posted ITT.

Google the concept of regression to the mean, it's a super simple statistical concept. You will see I am right.
>>2466052
You need two alleles to have the anemia. Open up a genetics book, a lot of your views will be sobered up.

>>2466007
It's so I can fucking emphasise it by capitalisation you complete retard
Are you actually half white or something?
How can you be this incapable of real discussion?

>>2466101
So mad.

Just hit the caps lock, that will show people who point our your contradictions.

>>2466121
Oh, you're trolling
You've wasted my time, well done
So fucking clever of you

>>2463455
No there isn't. I myself am in a mixed race relationship as are many of my cousins who have had children with blacks, indians and asians.

>>2466071
You didn't even read either of the links. Everything you just said is a lie.

>>2466142
>No there isn't. I'm doing it myself

>>2466157
Yes and it's going great so why would it be a bad thing?

>>2466154
took you a while to respond, hope you read what regression to the mean means
>In statistics, regression toward (or to) the mean is the phenomenon that if a variable is extreme on its first measurement, it will tend to be closer to the average on its second measurement—and if it is extreme on its second measurement, it will tend to have been closer to the average on its first.
above definition should tell you everything you need to know, it's from wikipedia article

take N healthy africans, who have the sickle cell allele at a frequency of p and N healthy euros who have the cystic fibrosis allele at frequncy q.

What is the freqency of the alleles after enough generations of mixing.
p/2, q/2
what is the frequency of the two diseases
(p/2)^2, (q/2)^2

The original populations had probabilities of cystic fibrosis and sickle cell anemia of
(p^2, 0) and (0, q^2)
the new has
((p/2)^2, (q/2)^2)

this is a positive development if you look at the absolute number of sick people, and especially the number of people who will have cystic fibrosis, since it's a very tough disease to have

>>2466176
>it's going great
No it isn't
> many of my cousins who have had children with blacks, indians and asians

Read the thread

>>2466126
Do you have anything to say aside from race mixing is wrong, unless it's whites raping other races?

I don't really care where you stand, but your desire to say the above is right, then trying to break right and wrong into categories when you realized you were supporting rape is what worked you into this corner.

Is it right or wrong? There is no two ways about it. No ethnically right, but morally wrong, but racially right bullshit anon. Right or wrong.

>>2464707
Why do people self segregate along racial lines? Or is this complete absence of oppression/opposition something that's hypothetical and never been attained?

>>2466188
Of course there are different spheres of group interests that overlap, and some times something is racially right but morally wrong

>>2464694
You're right they're just race mixed and look how much lower they are than whites. It's a solid point against such mixing.

>>2466184
>this is a positive development
No it isn't, diseases exist in different frequencies in different places. We evolved seperately for our climates.

How do you guys feel knowing that to most normal people they don't even think about "race mixing" at all? and that you've devoted a whole day and 300+ replies to arguing why it's bad. And that 90% of people if you told them "yeah I argued for hours on the internet about why race mixing is bad" would think you were a fucking cranky nutjob?

File: 1423693894478.jpg (596KB, 1000x750px) Image search: [Google]

596KB, 1000x750px

>let's destroy all the peoples of the world and turn everyone into a race of mudpeople, it'll be cool, heh

>>2466227
Not to mention they've been continually BTFO by anons posting evidence.

>>2466227
>How do you guys feel that schools force your kids to learn about how great diversity is, and how their country doesn't matter? How do you feel that all politicians feel the need to applaud the destruction of white people as a group?
I want to kill myself, but I know suicide is immoral

>>2464805
I had a girlfriend whose mom was Asian and dad Polish and she told me that she felt since she was young that she didn't really belong to either group. She also said how much she liked my blond hair and blue eyes very often. I broke up with her once I got 23andme results and am dating a white girl now, just felt guilty/hypocritical staying with her.

>>2466215
You just chose feels over reals (as in numbers).
Not to mention you got schooled on at least 3 concepts.

If you take anything away from this, remember what regression to the mean actually is.

>>2466186
Yes it is. We love each other and get along well. My girlfriends family sees me as one of their own and vice versa.

>>2466200
>racially right but morally wrong

Is it ethnically ok but judicially wrong?

How about religiously wrong but ethnographically right?

>>2464842
You don't understand, they will always be the authoritarian ruler of course!

>>2466258
I'm not >>2466154
I'm saying that 25% susceptible to A, 25% susceptible to B is not better than 100% susceptible to A, 0% to B
(as an example)

>>2466259
>personal gain makes it ok

>>2466265
Which judiciary? Almost any country today would allow it
Ethnically, it depends, but I would say it's largely in the best interests of the ethnicity involved
Religiously, it depends on the religion
Ethnographically, what's meant by that? I guess it could be bad because half-whites could be mistaken for full whites

Any more?

>>2465042
Somalis are caucasian? I don't understand that pic

>>2465921
First generation immigrants typically earn above average in states with merit based immigration systems. Their children regress to the mean. Indians have a much higher % of STEM degrees than whites but that's because of how we select those immigrants.

>>2466305
I think indians are also more closely related to Europeans than arabs or africans

>>2466286
>Any more?

Sure.

Environmentally? Academically? Aesthetically?

Shall we break right and wrong into a thousand categories to keep you from having to answer right or wrong?

>>2465379

I vote to genocide you and your family, fuccboi.

>>2466316
>>2466286
RATIONALLY your conversation has been dumb, but IN TERMS OF ENTERTAINMENT the spam has been hilarous and FINALLY autism

>>2466239
in favour of who?

>>2466316
>Environmentally
I'd say it depends
To some degree, you might think certain tribally societies are better for the environment
Then again, there are examples like aboriginals burning down forests for food, or preservation attempts by certain races.
>Academically
White, Asian, Indian.
Whites have certainly produced the most academic work, asians have a higher IQ and are catching up, Indians might do this too if we don't fix the west.

>Aesthetically
Aesthetically, race mixing is almost always bad. There are some exceptions, like the Finns, who have partly mongoloid DNA (I think).


>Shall we break right and wrong into a thousand categories to keep you from having to answer right or wrong?
What are you talking about? I already said I thought rape was morally wrong. I said that from the start.

>>2466305
Most Indians in the UK are 2nd or 3rd generation immigrants.

>>2466333
Glad it's been entertaining.

>>2466335
>What are you talking about? I already said I thought rape was morally wrong. I said that from the start.

>RACIALLY AND ETHNICALLY it is ok. MORALLY it is wrong.

So wrong then? Or is it still wrong with some right? Mostly wrong?

Right in every other sense but morally?

I'll ask again. Is it right or wrong? There is no third option, no modifiers, no weaseling out of your decision.

>>2466438
Yes, it's morally wrong.

>>2466460
You are entertaining.

>>2465831
>moving the goalposts

>>2466335
>Finnsa have Mongoloid DNA
Get your 19th century memery out of here.

>>2466005
>Why is the average iq in India 82 but the average iq in the UK is 100?
Because most of the UK is educated.
>inb4 it doesn't matter
It does or else the IQ level of the country wouldn't be rising throughout the decades.

>>2466312
>Arabs

They should be closer to Europeans just by location alone. Indians are half Caucasian half Australoid depending on their location.

>>2467151
Indians and Europeans share common ancestors, less than 10k years ago, it's been determined by language and genetics
i think

>>2467151
>>2467161
Indians aren't a single ethnicity however. The more down south you go the more australoid it gets. Same thing for when you move north.

>>2467180
Yes, and Iranians too are descended from a common ancestor with indians and europeans

File: back to pol.jpg (126KB, 546x700px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 546x700px

>>2463686

>>2463689
>Reproduce with whoever you love,
Can someone say Spook??