Okay, let's sort it out once and for all.
Does this turd's magnum opus contain anything besides the two simple ideas: 1) that we should think about the idea of "being", and 2) that you should just be yourself to live a good life, these being spiced by pages upon pages of gobbledygook that, by its sheer amount, is supposed to lull the reader into accepting these stated laughable "insights"?
How about you actually read a book instead of asking for a quick synopsis
>>2455924
So, is Heidegger's thought qualitatively different from all philosophical teachings before and after him in that it absolutely cannot be summarized in one or two paragraphs, or is it a uniquely Heideggerian thing to behave like cult members who say that, unless you read hundreds of pages of their literature/watch 1000 hours of their guru's lectures, you cannot even start to understand their true faith?