Why is it that we refer to him in his first name as opposed to

>>2451604
He would have wanted it that way. He wanted to be on a first-name basis with the world

>>2451604
>>2451604
Monarchs are referred to by their first names and he was an Emperor.

>>2451604
>Why is it that we refer to him in his first name
Because he was a monarch you troglodyte. Have you ever heard anyone referring to Nicholas II as "Mr. Romanov"?

>>2451604

boring topic

>Napoleon was everything stormfags pretend Hitler was

how true is this?

You can refer to him as "Bonaparte" if you want. No law against it; unless proposition 308 passes, which we're all praying will.

>>2451904
>Have you ever heard anyone referring to Nicholas II as "Mr. Romanov"?

Yes, the bolsheviks and other assorted socialists did so.

>>2451907
hmm makes you think

>>2451907
>le stormfags xD
Do you niggers have to shit up every thread with this bullshit?

>>2451909
The Polish national anthem calls him Bonaparte.

Although that's because it was written when he was a general.

>>2451936

>getting this butthurt over a comparison of hitler and napoleon

>>2451943
There's currently like 4 active threads about Hitler, go back there faggot.

File: Caligula.jpg (1MB, 2360x3228px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2360x3228px

Why is it that we refer to him in his nickname as a kid as opposed to his last like every other historical figure?

File: 1469065074798.png (638KB, 495x597px) Image search: [Google]

638KB, 495x597px

Why is it that we refer to him in his made up name as opposed to his real name like every other historical figure?

>>2451604
>Why is it that we refer to him in his first name as opposed to his last like every other historical figure?

That's not the case of Denzel Washington

File: Yeshua.png (1MB, 768x1005px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 768x1005px

Why is it that we refer to him in his actual name as opposed to his label like every other historical figure?

>>2451955
Because he was a coward annoying shitposter.

File: Gandhara_Buddha2.jpg (362KB, 701x1024px) Image search: [Google]

362KB, 701x1024px

Why is it that we refer to him for what he is as opposed to his tribal name like every other historical figure?

>>2451604
You're right. The only people commonly referred to by their first names are Monarchs and Emperors, and it's not like he's famous for being an Emperor or anything.

File: davinci.jpg (143KB, 650x393px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 650x393px

Why is it that we refer to him as a place as opposed to his first name like every other historical figure?

>>2451907
How about an actual thought provoking topic?

Robespierre was closer to Hitler than Napoleon was. Discuss

>>2451937
Did Poland even exist then?

>>2451991
Nope.

>>2451907
If by that you mean
>Got increasingly ambitious and irrational
>didn't know when to give up
>was incredibly abusive to his "allies"
Then yeah, Napoleon was like Hitler.

Realistically, though, there really isn't much similarity beyond the very superficial.

>>2451991
It had ceased to exist two years before.

Which is why you had tens of thousands of Polish volunteers under general Bonaparte in northern Italy and later through the Napoleonic wars hoping to secure the aid of Revolutionary France in restoring Poland. Which is why https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duchy_of_Warsaw was a thing later on.

>>2452034
>19th and 20th centuries were the best two centuries in the history of Western civilisation
>also the worst two centuries in the history of Poland

really makes you ponder

>>2452067
>20th century
>best
lol

>>2451604
>Why is it that we refer to him in his first name as opposed to his last like every other historical figure?
Sounds cooler

>>2451907
Not very. Napoleon was quire racially progressive for the time. He even had a black general.

>>2451955
The first shitposter

>>2451985
yeah... napoleon was also guilty of genocide on haiti - but robespierre was by far closer to hitler than anyone else during the revolution

fortunately ( or unfortunately) he wasn't has successful has hitler was in his quest to get his nation rid of what he saw has the enemy of the people

>>2451898
>>2451904
/thread

>>2451604
>last like every other historical figure
give me 5 examples pls

>>2453055
Washington, Saladin, Wellington, Trump, Bush, Reagan, Roosevelt

>>2453093
That was 7 examples

>>2452432
>napoleon was also guilty of genocide on haiti

get out

File: C56VApEXEAAYdAG.jpg (130KB, 749x1014px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 749x1014px

>>2453093

Trump really will already be more historically significant than his haters want to admit

File: RA2_Romanov.jpg (34KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 640x480px

>>2451904
>Mr Romanov
>Were supposed to be allies

>>2453093
Wellington wasn't his name, but title. His name was Arthur Wellesley
Salah ad-Din was his laqab (so pretty much a title too). His first name was Yusuf, and patronimic bin Ayyub.

>>2453694
did I touch a nerve?
history it's not just the good parts, you little faggotcunt

>>2454170
>No Comrade Premier, it has only just begun.
DUDUDUDUDUDU DUDUDUDUDUUUUUUUUU

>>2451604
Because his last name is too close to Boner Fart and weird twitter wasn't invented yet

>>2451950
Vikings.

>>2452371

WE

File: Napoleon_returned.jpg (751KB, 1641x1189px) Image search: [Google]

751KB, 1641x1189px

Because Napoleon is our friend, and we call friends by their first name.

>>2455183
pls come back Napoleon

File: George_Orwell.jpg (2MB, 1176x1596px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1176x1596px

>>2451955
That's not uncommon though.

>>2454170
>premier of the soviet union was a romanov
I fucking loved this game