I'll make up a concept right now called concept-1. Imagine I asked you what concept-1's true meaning was. Imagine I asked you what concept-1 said I should do when herding goats in Rwanda and I have a cold. And similarly for a hundred other situations. Imagine I claimed that the investigation to find the true definition of concept-1 would require many more years. You'd think I was stupid. Maybe you'd point out that I just invented the term, so I should just define concept-1. You'd say that the "solutions" to the scenarios would have to be arbitrarily defined.
Now imagine the same thing but instead of concept-1 we look at "morality". Why is the investigation taken any more seriously?
>>2444051
Because morality covers what happens when humans die. And don't get humans started on death.
>>2444051
>reads wikipedia article on Nietzsche once
bravo anon you've tackled the first five minutes of community college ethics 101