Are there people who truly believe that the world would be better off right now in the absence of US global superiority following WW2?
In the context of what would have likely occurred without the presence of the US, and relative to how other countries have historically behaved while in power, US global influence has been pretty damn positive.
Having the central focus of power shift from Europe to North America is arguably the best thing that's ever happened to the world for peace and prosperity.
Fuck off retarded yank
Yes. They tend to be evphoric Evropa reactionary types.
>>2440434
>North America
Fuck do you mean by North America, just say the USA. Mexico and Canada are completely irrelevant.
>>2440451
But, man, Greenland sure has its grip on the world!
Simply being in power lends itself to a disproportionate amount of criticism, and a wild exaggeration of faults.
The era of US reign will almost certainly be seen positively in the future.
>>2440434
>Are there people who truly believe that the world would be better off right now in the absence of US global superiority following WW2?
Yes, mostly Neo-Nazi's/Tankies trying to be as contrary as possible.
You can argue however that it wouldn't have mattered for the vast majority of people, as they would still suffer under exploitation regardless of the country in charge
>>2440553
this
the USA has clearly had a lot of fuck ups but every single world leader has. The USA will be viewed as a mostly positive force in the future.
Can you imagine the world if the USSR had been allowed to do whatever they want? It would be totally fucked.
>>2440443
>They tend to be evphoric Evropa reactionary types.
They were commieboo europoor commies before that.