>there are people with different opinions than you
Why are they allowed to exist?
>>2428432
By the same logic, you would be the same as well then. If allowed to attack free willy-nilly, it would drag, though, after all, we are 7 billion. You may never know as to how many will be left that agree with you.
Ask for another Toba from nature and it would solve your problem.
>>2428432
>Someone on /his/ disagrees with me
>Can't prove them wrong
REEEEEEEEEEE WHY IS THIS ALLOWED??
>2017
>having opinions
>not recognizing you are stupid and simply parroting the thoughts of your intellectual superiors blindly
I seriously hope you do not do this
>>2428432
The only people who need to be exterminated are the totalitarians. But they would destroy themselves if all able-minded men and women simply left them to die in the ditches where they originally spawned.
Unfortunately, there's a great deal of otherwise intelligent people who feel that it would be inhumane to simply leave these literal cancer cells to rot.
this place is bastion of free speech anon
if you want a place where they ban different opinion then >reddit
Liberals? I don't know. Fucking purge them all, I say
I am good and smart.
I like certain things and dislike other things.
Since I am good and smart, the things that I like must be Good, because I like them. The things I don't like must be Bad.
Other people sometimes like things that I don't like. These people must be Bad People, because they are stupid enough to like something that is Bad because I don't like it.
>people who's opinions aren't based off objective evidence are supposed to be treated as equally valid as my own
WHO INVENTED THIS SHIT MEME
>>2428432
there must be. how else would I be superior?
>>2429062
>only opinions with evidence are valid
A priori > A posteriori