Why has the west always been so gynocentric compared to the rest

>>2413408
It hasn't.

I hate this board.

Tha pic brings memories, they used it in a theosophical group for their internal magazine.
>Enter to ask a few questions
>they want to initiate me into everything in sight
Fucking hell

I don't think anybody can say why. I just like to assume that apart from a few brief periods western men have been chronically whipped since they first came into existence.

When the hordes of barbarians were sacking roman cities women were right there with them. Justinian let his wife run the empire alongside him. Among the Germanics we have women like Brunhilda of Austrasia, who became legendary. Similarly there were women like Sikelgaita in the middle ages who weren't just allowed to act independently, but were political forces in their own right. The huge influence of the Marian cult, and all the female saints who were honored as influential religious leaders are yet further evidence of this phenomenon.

It is difficult to say whether it is good or bad. It seems to me like just an intrinsic aspect of western culture.

Boy is that one kitschy picture

>>2413422
/his/ was a mistake

Why moot didn't make it.

File: 1477622294424.jpg (53KB, 1304x199px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 1304x199px

>>2413688

>>2413688
who?

File: 1487910442254.jpg (39KB, 420x420px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 420x420px

>>2413524
>kitschy
Whenever I hear that word, I imagine the greasiest, jewiest kike I can possibly think of rubbing his hands together fast enough to start a fucking fire
And I'm probably pretty spot on with you, Goldberg

Something about our genes. I wouldn't mind if women were receptive but they really aren't.

>>2415401
lol wtf, why this fullblast /pol/ishness right out the gate