>"Hey anonymous, you are aware of the fascist nature

File: image.jpg (36KB, 385x385px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 385x385px

>tfw the Frankfurt school is right, capitalism really did eradicate all genuine culture with the only ones holding out being maybe the Middle East

It's an odd feel.

File: Identifying Ressentiment.png (619KB, 500x775px) Image search: [Google]

619KB, 500x775px

>fascist, adj.
>Behaving in a manner perceived as autocratic, intolerant, or oppressive

There's no more flagrant demonstration of the ressentiment of the liberals than their obvious view of the entire past, not only man's, but all of nature's, as a mistake. Wars, conquerors, hierarchies, and even masculinity itself were all bad and evil, including all other animals (the jungle), and even the stars themselves for having the temerity to explode (it goes against "conservation" and respect for the environment) — never mind that without wars and hierarchies there'd be no civilization any more than without exploding stars there would be life. "The basest creature will see the domain of evil everywhere" (Nietzsche). Conversely, the highest creature would see no evil at all. The concept of evil would seem to it to be something ridiculous and absurd.

Despotism is the start of everything — what allowed us to part ways from the animals and forge our own future. It was strong human beings who took control of the herd and turned it into a tribe, the tribe into a city, the city into a nation, the nation into an empire, the empire into a culture, and finally the culture... into an Overman. And it is the strong (no-longer-so-)human being who, once more, will lead the way by lighting the match that will send up the entire world in flames.

>>2387984

>he thinks adorno was resentful of the past
>he thinks adorno didn't read nietzsche
>he thinks he knows neitzsche better than adorno
>he hasn't overcome nieztsche yet
>he thinks adorno isn't saving civilization, not condemining it

laughinggirls.webm

>>2387978
>>2387992
>genuine culture
>Middle East
Pure decadence.

What is "capital"? It is simply another word for money, which is a medium that facilitates exchange. Capitalism, then, is merely a state of things in which individuals are able, and allowed, to enter into exchange. That's all it is. Capitalism = Exchange. And since it is impossible for any culture and civilization at all to exist without exchange (indeed exchange is the number one prerequisite for civilization, with language itself understood as a form of exchange, the exchange of feelings), we might as well say that Capitalism = Civilization. To be against capitalism, then, means to be against civilization — which is par for the course for the kind of subhuman dreck which perpetually champions this nauseating, decadent notion. Just take a good look at them and you'll see.

>overcome Nietzsche
You don't 'overcome' a thinker by retreating from their explosive work in Ethics and its relation to socialism, pretending it never happened.

>>2387978

>tfw you'll read walter benjamin's thoughts on the internet

>>2388016

*never read

>>2388016
What's wrong with Baudrillard?

>>2388025

muh signs, muh hyperreality

i haven't read anything by baudrillard on the internet though tbf, i've only really read stuff on the gulf war and commodities/exchange

>>2388055
Well, wouldn't you say the hyperreality (information age) is almost a contemporary version of the psychological analysis of the machine-age/reproducibility?