> Niggers are incapable of building civ-
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timbuktu
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Zimbabwe
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingdom_of_Kongo
>>2384726
Only productive discussion will ensue
>>2384726
Those were built by ancient white people you fucktard
>>2384750
>implying
it was the atlanteans, you pathetic sheeple
get woke
>>2384726
Literal mud castles.
Big sand castle?
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timbuktu
>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Zimbabwe
>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingdom_of_Kongo
prehistoric tier
>>2384726
All of those are still shit tier compared to 99% of what Asia and Europe crafted.
Even Timbuktu was largely built by non-sub Saharans(as dark as they were).
>>2384726
West Africans like east Africans aren't
black though. Africa =/= black
>>2384847
only north africans aren't black
>>2384847
What are you talking about? West Africa is the home of bantus aka blacks.
I think you guys are needlessly harsh about the whole mud thing. It makes sense given the environment, although it's a rather temporary material. I may build a mud hut myself in the future.
>>2384726
>Timbuktu
This was probably more the Tuaregs who are mixed with berber. The rest check out
>>2384872
And when you need to relocate it's easy to build a new house elsewhere when the local soil is decreasing in output and quality.
>>2384850
>only north africans aren't black
east africans like ethiopians are mixed. 40-50% eurasian mixed.
>>2384875
Timbuktu didn't get its reknown under the tuareg though and the Arma became songhayised over time and a fuckton of manuscripts are mostly in local languages
>>2384891
Not really.most genes are local and the only out of African ones were from pre agricultural times from a fuck long time ago. Even then if Ethiopians are mixed so is pretty much every group so that point proves absolutely nothing since regardless they get treated as blacks
>>2384897
arent the Arma ethnically berber or at least heavily berber mixed though?