How the hell did Romania fully switch from fascism to communism

>>2382265
Russians

>>2382265
Soviet army perhaps?

>>2382265
Romania didn't switch, it was switched.
Same goes for most of eastern Europe.

The fascist overthrew the monarchy (King Michael, he's still alive today!) and quickly aligned with Germany. Romania joined the axis and in 1944 King Michael returned and removed the fascist, sadly King Michael was back stabbed by the people who helped him and these people who were communist overthrew him and made Romania communist. The soviets helped somewhat also.

>>2382265
It's not like the two ideologies are particularly different in practice.

>>2382437
What did he mean by this

>>2382412
Not accurate. The fascists overthrew the previous king, Carol II, because he was losing all Romanian territories to the soviets; the king abdicated at a later time. Due to the threat of soviet invasions, the fascists had to ally with Germany and become their most important source of oil. They managed to get most of their territories back thanks to the Germans, but this prompted bombing raids by the Allies. When Germany started losing the war, king Michael I (the son of Carol II) allied with the Allies and led the revolt against the fascists in the attempt to regain the throne. This consequently allowed the soviet red army to invade the country and gain full control of it by taking over the capital. Communists then forced a fake election and established themselves as the leaders; king Micheal I got shafted and kicked out of the country soon after, so much for selling his ass to the Allies.

>>2382437
Better to die in war while fighting for your country than to die of hunger while feeding a bunch of parasites.

Romanian manpower had been mostly bled by the war. When only one power is the one around with guns, it's an easy switch.

>>2382541
Fuck I hate communist so much
>Romania tries to redeem itself
>Return to peace under monarchy
>Get turned into filthy soviet satellite state

File: 1487269238923.jpg (153KB, 485x320px) Image search: [Google]

153KB, 485x320px

>>2382628

Would you rather have remained an agrarian banana republic under an outdated social system? Because if that would have been the case, you'd be out in the field plowing an sowing like a good little iobag instead of shitposting on /his/.

>>2384228
Monarchy's are based though, especially in Eastern Europe. The real crime would have been exactly what happened now, become a corrupt liberal regime under the iron fist of USA and NATO.

File: 1487269158797.jpg (30KB, 301x395px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 301x395px

>>2384240

Monarchies ar far easier to control. We'd have been a forced grain exporter for western europe, controlled by Austria and Hungary. The vast majority of people would have been illiterate bonded peasants. How's that "based"?

>>2384274
Ah yes, the illiterate countries of Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg and the United Kingdom

File: 1487269196638.jpg (50KB, 476x316px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 476x316px

>>2384375

> Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg and the United Kingdom

Which were all EASTERN EUROPEAN agrarian countries with a small group of landed gentry recieving money for the lands that were worked by people living in holes in the ground and had about the same rights as cattle. You stupid cunt.

>>2384389
>that were worked by people living in holes in the ground and had about the same rights as cattle.
This is what commies actuary believe.

File: titus.jpg (15KB, 480x712px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 480x712px

>>2384519

Bai muisor. Tu stii ce este un bordei? Un iobag stii ce e? Stii cand a fost abolita iobagia de jure? Ca iobagia de facto a durat mult mai mult? Stii ce drepturi aveau iobagii?

Daca nu stii, mars inapoi pe /pol/ ca acolo vei gasi un nivel al discursului mai adecvat pentru nivelul tau.

>>2384550

>mai adecvat pentru nivelul tau

=

> mai adecvat pentru gandirea ta

ca sa nu ma repet