Why didn't France just move all their industry south of the Seine and call up more men? It's not like they were a poor country, they were the second largest European power after Britain, they could have put up way more of a fight. They have a large population and lots of wealth, and they could have probably just stringed more from Roosevelt.
>"Mon Dieu, Le Allegmane will destroy Paree!!"
Cause it would be so hard to repair a monstrously hideous cast iron radio tower
>tfw you actually realise that more Frenchmen died volunteering for the German side than in the battle of france
What are you trying to achieve with this thread?
I don't understand why Germany tried to occupy half of France. Should have just destroyed the border defenses and used it as a chip to come to peace with the UK.
They already bled fighting off the germs in WW1, it was Russia's turn this time.
>>2376716
>just move all industry
That is not as easy as you think
>>2376761
nor something that can be realistically done while you are being rapidly overrun by an invading army, the Russians and Chinese were able to do it in very different circumstances than what France was facing. That said the French capitulation did seem to be quite premature.
>>2376716
>Largest European power after Great Britain
What is it with Anglos and being delusional?
>>2376791
France didn't have the huge territory Russia had, once it's heart taken ( Paris ) it couldn't have continued the war on their own soil.
>>2376837
He is clearly including both countries overseas empires.
the final defence they gave after the encirclement was already desperate, to the point that it was more of a symbolic move than anything.
Moving their navy and as much of their army as possible overseas is the best they could have done
>>2376716
>battle of france
Battle of France costed the live of 300K French
The Army of Vichy and the various French division of the SS and the Wehrmacht didn't reach such casuality.