>scandinavian economic model is a social corporatist government

Sweden practiced literal eugenics into the early 80s

Olaf palme was a meme they are planning something big.

>>2369851
>Scandinavia
>Finland
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

Scandinavia have one of the most representative democracies and have succeed in achieving a very high social mobility. It was also created by the Social Democrats, thus it became a socialist meme.

It sure as hell took some parts from early Italian fascism, but rooted it in a strong democratic foundation.

>>2371987
Fennoscandinavia then

>>2372038
Are fascism and democracy mutually exclusive? Because based on my (admittedly a little cursory) reading on fascism, the "Scandinavian model" does seem rather fascist

Really hope this thread doesn't slide into the whole fascism is totalitarian authoritarian oppressive bigoted racist sexist hitlertrumpism...

>>2372064
>Are fascism and democracy mutually exclusive?
Short answer, yes. Long answer, yes, but some parts might be worked into a democratic model.
Fascism was a direct response to the perceived failure of parliamentarian democracy.
Fascism does state that nature , not the people, will elect the strongest leader, who should have full authority over every aspect of society, . This leader should aim to make the different classes work together in harmony, so as to create stability.

Can some aspects of fascism, like the economic model, be introduced to a democracy? Certainly so, but fascism is totalitarian at its base.

>>2372056
No because then Denmark wouldn't be included.

>>2369851
>Sjælland uses the correct Danish spelling
>Jylland doesn't

Explain

>>2372108
The key aspects of fascism being strength through unity and a union of sorts between the corporate and the government worlds, could the people themselves feasibly be the "strong leader"?

A democratic government with a very powerful, yet still elected, executive arm perhaps?

>>2372108
Fascism is incoherent with the notion of a Bill of Rights or something of the sort, yes, but it absolutely can work with Democracy. You know how one of the two nationalist parties in the EU Parliament calls itself the Party of "Freedom and Direct Democracy"? Fascism can get behind that.

>>2372143
Well that is basically the Scandinavian model, although that model does still severely limit the executive power of whatever government is in place. The government in Scandinavia is expected to have a foot inside every aspect of society, but it's still guided and restricted by Supreme Courts, Constitutions and other political obstructions.


Also this ideology is very far removed from what fascism originally was. Making the "strong leader" into a representative parliament is a long stretch from what the first fascists envisioned.

>>2372162
Nationalism can easily be highly democratic, almost in all European nations did these two ideologies go hand in hand.
But nationalism is simply not the same as fascism.

>>2372191
>But nationalism is simply not the same as fascism.
Stupid Putin don't think so

>>2372197
Russians call anything they dont like fascism. Their culture still hates it from the soviet days so its a good buzzword to use to get the stupid masses to act outraged.

>>2372175
>Making the "strong leader" into a representative parliament is a long stretch from what the first fascists envisioned.

Similar, in contrast perhaps, to how communism always ended up being controlled by a "strong leader" as opposed to the people/system of local and national soviets?

>>2372132
Are you saying Denmark > Finland?

>>2369851
>Finland

File: pekka_siitoin.gif (3MB, 480x320px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 480x320px

Are you guys seriously trying to say that (Fenno)Scandinavian prosperity is because of disguised facism?

>>2372132
No that's Fennoscandia, Fennoscandinavia includes Denmark too