As an egoist, why should i support the removal of power structures that benefit my race and in turn me?
>>2363160
You shouldn't.
There are no power structures that benefit your race and by extension you.
>>2363160
>egoist
>caring about race
>>2363165
WDYM?
>>2363167
>Skin color
>Not an objective fact
Spooky lad
>>2363172
>holding an imagined affiliation with others based on skin color higher than the self
That's what's spooky.
>>2363168
I mean exactly what I wrote.
>>2363165
White privilege and institutionalized racism benefit me though.
>>2363177
Police
That's a power structure that benefits me
>>2363176
>Not using skin color to your advantage by spooking others
Are you a Habsburg or some shit baka
>>2363178
>White privilege and institutionalized racism benefit me though.
Well they don't exist, so even if they did benefit you, it's not like it matters.
>>2363160
because you have virtually no influence over the outcome it is not worth the effort
>>2363186
Spooking others isn't for your primary benefit, it is against the primary benefit of others. Why would you expend your energy like that?
>>2363188
>They don't exist
Light-skinned individuals are less likely to be shot by police (spook upholders) than dark-skinned individuals.
Pro tip: When a spook applies to you use it to your advantage as any egoist would
>y-you s-should've do that it's racist and mean
t. stirnerite
>>2363195
>Light-skinned individuals are less likely to be shot by police (spook upholders) than dark-skinned individuals.
No they are not. The police in America shoot and kill way more white people than black people, and a Harvard study concluded that police hesitate shooting black people way more often than whites.
Do they really benefit you, and are they sustainable?
>>2363195
>Light-skinned individuals are less likely to be shot by police (spook upholders) than dark-skinned individuals.
Apparently controlling for violent crime is a spook.
As an egoist, shouldn't you focus on stuff you can influence rather than stuff that is out of your control, like politics? Realistically, you won't change the trajectory of national politics, except in the sense that a snowflake contributes to an avalanche. Things will go pretty much the same whether you participate or not. So therefore, you should focus on your own life and not pointless indulgence in the political circus.
>>2363210
Yes, they do. But when you calculate the proportion of population(13% blacks), blacks have a 2.5 higher chance of getting killed by police, when compared to whites.
>>2363160
>why should I
Because you are a niave reductionist that can't see that things like racialism are complete nonsense. Let alone see that you aren't seperate from the rest of existence, that you are a literal metaphorical leaf on the tree of humanity in the forest of life in the world of nature.
You are just part of an interconnected and interdependent multiplex of networks that constitute an ultrasystem that pervades through all spatial-temporal reality.
So why?
Because you are nothing more than what you know. And you are a fundementaly misunderstood reality.
Get woke n00b
This reductive separation of your ego from the rest of nature is a result of the human beings anachronistic cognition.
If you are going to be an egoist, you should atleast try to slip the surly bonds of yourself and broaden your perspective. If you are an egoist and your ego is just the body you inhabit and not its habitat, you're doing it wrong.
>>2363167
speciesist and racist and classist privilege at the expense of other sentients is a spook lmao, is that why oppressed races and classes are so angry? (of course other species just squeal but then sub-saharan children dying in coltan mines can't object either)
>>2363176
species is a construct like decency which doesn't prevent tasty pigs from being slaughtered for our belly to enjoy them
>>2363176
species is a construct just like decency which doesn't prevent tasty pigs from being slaughtered for our belly to enjoy them
>>2363858
too bad the perceptions of those who suffer aren't the same of those who exploit them and there is no evidence for punishments in the afterlife
>>2363858
lol it's the humans are a hivemind bs again
Neck yourself you faggot.
>>2363160
Well there's a difference between being an egoist in an actual ideological form, or just being a selfish prick.
The reason that egoists (making sweeping generalizations here) would want to tear down any oppresive power structure, is because they respect others autonomy and right to free self-betterment.
An egoist may want rid the world of any form of racism because they know the eradication of this oppresive force will benefit them in the long run.
I'm not an egoist but people generally have a very simple view of what an egoist is. There are reasons to help others for selfish reasons, even someone like Rand would argue that.
>moral relativists are BTFO by C.S. Lewis
>they resort to "spookposting"
Glad to see you admit defeat, godless commies.