>supply side economics >demand side economics Are people

>>2362822

Supply side economics says that the government should engage in policies favorable to businesses.

Demand side economics says that the government should engage in policies favorable to consumers.

The best form of economics is one that realizes the effective demand is always below full employment, when the quantity theory of money would be true.

Prove me wrong.

>>2363077
>quantity theory of money

You already proved yourself wrong.

It is more difficult to regulate demand. A simple example would be an orange seller and their many daily customers. If you want to ensure people can get high quality low cost oranges through good policy it is generally easier to look at the orange seller than the personal whims of 100s of people.

>>2362853
Supply side economics helps the consumer. If you want to stop people selling rotten fruit it is easier to tell the orange seller they aren't allowed to sell rotten fruit than to fund PSAs to warn consumers about the risks when buying fruit.

>>2363175
Can't you read. I basically said the quantity theory of money is rarely, if ever, correct.

>>2362822
>You can't have supply unless you have demand, and you can't have demand unless you have supply.
Yes, they're like two sides of the same coin. Hence "supply side" and "demand side."

>>2362822
You might be an idiot.

Nobody wanted an iPhone until they were invented, marketed, and produced.

>>2363253
Raising or lowering money wages
Raising or lowering interest rates
Buying stock off of a firm/company about to go through a slump

All of these regulate demand. They are very easy to accomplish. The government does the second aaaallllll the time.

>>2363274
Japan's doing all 3 and manipulating their currency lmao