Why does almost everyone in the world either advocate for some

distributism ftw

>>2319843
Well just curious what other systems would you propose

Neo feudalism where? Russia?

File: 1485959560645.jpg (179KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

179KB, 1280x720px

they just don't understand that technology will eventually push humans into singular ant-queen type entities with individuals governing large fields of automation, maintaining neutral and loosely allied bodies among the cosmos.

>>2319880
Nah, more likely we will all die I say.

>>2319880
We ashes of the singularity now.

>>2319843
>>2319871
I would like to hear OP's suggestion as well

>>2319888
yeah you don't know two shits about power distribution and application. humans could probably survive a gamma ray burst at this point. we've been building some in-depth defensive measures since we started making nukes. I can't see anything short of consistent deliberate extermination or earth exploding in the near future ending humanity as a species.

>>2319880
what idd she mean by this I want rock dds with this cd the united kingdom of david and and soloon was a lie becausse finkelstein tells me so

>>2319926
Well I think the issue is that protocols will eventually fall apart and fail in the eventime of a disaster so i believe humanity could survive any one disaster. However, a series of disasters placed in the proper sussecion definitely could. So I guess it more a question of how long g do you think it would take humanity to reach your state.

>>2319871
>>2319917
I don't have a proposal. I was just thinking about the left/right divide in politics and how many people consider it a limited view of politics. I then applied that to economic systems in general and came to the conclusion that the capitalist/socialist divide seems like a limited view of economic systems as well.

>>2319938
there isn't much that's going to effect all of the hundreds->thousands of autonomous subterranean bunkers constructed that's a conceivable event.

>>2319943
Well remember that both of those terms actually include a vast array of beliefs. Also, there some alternatives but most of them involve giving material wealth some noble class. There is also the idea of technocracy. Beyond that you go into system that reject economics like tribalism.

>>2319951
Well the issue is the long term. If your society collapses because 99.99 percent of people die thend it becomes really hard to maintain those bunkers. So you need to give humanity enough time to recover. Also while the odds of getting hit by one are astronomically small there are asteroids that could melt away the entire crust.

>>2319963
yeah I even question our inability to divert impacts, if we knew for certain one was coming. we can organize a pretty acute amount of firepower in a dynamic array of ways without such an imminent threat. I think a gamma ray burst is more threatening than a large object, as you can't really divert it, but even that potentially survivable. but wtf do I know I smoke weed and masturbate to anime.