Why were Jews so well represented in Italian Fascist's,

>>2295169
>Why were Jews so well represented in Italian Fascist's, in all Russian revolutionary groups in the 19th century, in Socialist Revolutionaries (the group responsible for the most terrorist attacks, Social-Democrats closely following), in Russian Social-Democrats (later on bolsheviks too obviously) and all other revolutionary parties still present in 1905 or 1917 revolutions (and Bolshevik coup), in Cheka-GP and all following Soviet security forces, in post-WW2 Polish communist puppet regime and it's security organ's, quite literally everywhere where the destruction of the old was the object and were violence was not deemed an obstacle worth considering and in where any human sacrifice (of the 'old race') was acceptable?
Your question is based on a false premise. They weren't overrepresented.

'judeo-bolshevism' is a meme

File: Meet-the-Filthy-Libertarian-Anarcho-Capitalist-Jews-Ayn-Rand-Ludwig-von-Mises-Murry-Rothbard-Milton-Friedman.jpg (114KB, 402x482px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 402x482px

The Jews are the human player everyone else is an NPC.

>>2295196
Making max 2% of population and having 30% representation in organization is not overrepresentation?

There is no reason to use 'judeo-bolsevism', because Jews were highly represented in pretty much every 19th and early 20th century Russian revolutionary parties or groups, not just Social-Democrats.
And indeed in Mussolini's Fascist's too (but not as highly as in Russian groups and Soviet imposed organizations).

Jewish representation in Soviet imposed communist organizations started to fall fast when Soviet and Eastern-European Jews started to move to Israel.

>>2295169
>Russian reactionaries
>Jewish
Best be trolling Moishe

File: pavelic.jpg (66KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 640x640px

Start marrying Croatian Jews.

No academic historian denies the overrepresentation, but hardly anyone gives any other reason than antisemitism and that simply doesn't explain anything.
Benjamin Pinkus (Israeli Jew) gives these figure's in his 'The Jews of the Soviet Union', but does not explain why Jew would want to be good fellow of Cheka, hunger-genociding more Ukrainians than Nazi's killed Jews.
Richard Pipes also clearly shows Jewish participation in the Revolution and Bolshevik coup in his 'The Russian Revolution' and 'Russia under Bolshevik Regime' works, but does not explain why.
Solzenitshyn tries to in his 'Two hundred years together', but ultimately fails, probably because he didn't want to be seen too 'antisemitistic'.

Historians always find reasons for why some other nationality (who is not majority in the country in question) is highly represented in some terrible political organization, but not for Jews. Why is that?

>>2295258
>Jewish representation in Soviet imposed communist organizations started to fall fast when Soviet and Eastern-European Jews started to move to Israel.
Started to fall, but slowly. Andropov was Jew.

>>2295169
>Why did - for example - Polish Jews actively work with invading forces during the Third Partition of Poland, when the invading forces were just as 'antisemitic' as Poles?

Wut? In the P-L Commonwealth there really was no significant anti-semitism. The Jews had rights that even the nobility didn't hold (like brewing several kinds of alcohol), were generally held as a separate estate from nobility/priests/peasants-burghers. During the Frankist movement whole bunch of Jews converted to Christianity in 1760s and were adopted into leading Polish noble families - Polish national poet Mickiewicz's mother was descended from Jewish converts.

>>2295326
>Andropov was Jew.
false

>>2295586
Yes, and thus
>were just as 'antisemitic' as Poles?
When more correct would have been to write that the invading forces were infact more 'antisemitic' (which is idiotic term, because not all semites are Jews).

>>2295871
And it is common narrative of Jewish historians (Polonsky for example from contemporaries) that Poles were 'antisemitic', when it definitely isn't the truth. Sure, there were antagonism againts Jews in all European countries to some extent, but definitely not to 'pogrom every sunday' -extent.

Fascist Jews? No fucking way, some source for this.

Certain groups of Jews have been in trades that required mental ability rather than typical prole shit for far longer than you'd think. When educational institutions became less theological it was a natural move for jews. It's always been in the interest of Jews to change societal order in a way that may be less harsh to Jews too. So they had the skillset to place them disproportionately in intellectual revoltionary vanguards and the motive.

>>2295881
Anyone who isn't constantly sucking Jewish cuck is considered anti-semetic. After all, Jews were gud boyz who dindu nuffin, right?

>>2295258
>Making max 2% of population and having 30% representation in organization is not overrepresentation?
This is just false.

>>2295300
(((why))) indeed

>>2295997
Nothing false to it in Russian context.
Before the Bolshevik coup, the percentange wavered of course, if you count all revolutionary groups and in some groups 30% might have not been met, but organizations imposed by the Bolsheviks, 30% of members being Jewish is almost always the minimal. In some places, like Kiev Cheka, Jews made 75% of all security men. First Politbyro, majority Jews.

>>2295976
Opportunism can hardly be seen as positive. All other nationalities (or at least all yuro's) receive flak for it.

German in Gestapo gassing the Jew is seen as Devil incarnate, but Jew in NKVD butchering Polish intelligentsia never get mentioned.

>>2295169
>Jews so well represented
>represented

That's SJW talk anon. Populations of people who share a few characteristics (culture, heritage, etc), who are all individuals, have no reason to have a "good" or "neutral" level of "representation" in anything.

>>2295955
George Soros