Did reactionaries actually think this bland shit was aesthetically

>>2256462
>compared to modern art
kys

File: vg.jpg (550KB, 1971x1572px) Image search: [Google]

550KB, 1971x1572px

>>2256465
Modern Artworks are undoubtedly better than that bland crap.

>>2256462
Well at least they send a message.

"Don't do steroids, it'll make your peepee tiny"

>>2256462

I think its just german autist because the spanish and italian fascist were fucking A E S T H E T I C

>>2256497
But Italians were making modern art, not pseudo-traditional kitsh like Germans.

>>2256476
>Post pic that looks like someone puked on a canvas
>better

>>2256513
Epic post.

*scribbles another masculine man to cover closeted homosexuality*

File: 20775-bb4540106t-1-3.jpg (386KB, 594x768px) Image search: [Google]

386KB, 594x768px

what does you guys think about this?

>>2256551
Decent piece of modern art. But the hands on second soldier and his bayonet looks weird.

>>2256551

they have joker faces.

>>2256462

>tfw body looks really similar to the statue

d-dick and all hhehe

>>2256462

>holding hands

LOL FAGS!

>>2256479
>"Don't do steroids, it'll make your peepee tiny"

>implying Breker subjects weren't growers

>>2256462
Deriving aesthetic enjoyment from the image of human physical potential being fulfilled is a sign of a healthy psycho-epistemology, anon. People who prefer looking at ugly things are mentally ill.

>>2256462
It's Prometheus Slash Fiction.