Why are the Vikings the main subject of history when you talk about Scandinavia, why is there no romanticized """history""" show about the Caroleans? What did they do wrong?
The wha-?
Did they invade Britain? No? So who cares?
>>2241494
Scandinavia in Medieval times is shithole. All historical sources talks only about Danes - Northmans - they are real Scourge of Europe and later they create Normandy - Sicilian Kingdoms, Great Britain etc. All other Skandi are just Fingol woodcutters. But later in times Calmar Union mass German colonization of Sweden (what is German name for this country) happened, and because of this Sweden begin dominate in Baltic region, Swedish Empire etc. Such greatness demand invention of epic ancestors and Swedes invent Gothicism.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gothicism
Is same shit as Sarmatism, but for Swedes.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarmatism
But later Gothic origin of Swedes become too laughable and they invent vikings in XIX century (historic sources know Normans, Danes but almost don't known vikings - only few timesmentioned about pathetic pirates). Swedes spread this shit vikings around the word by same vay as they spread Ikea now.
Why they don't fap to Swedish Empire instead? Because their Empire suck Russian dicks too often and Swedes not forget this yet.
>>2241539
They made Russians burn down their own villages to stop their march into Russia, it's unfair to state the Swedish (wewuz) Empire was sucking Ruski cock.
>>2241496
Professor Farnsworth thread?
>>2241552
Because of Russian Sweden stop be Empre and become modern cucks.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_between_Russia_and_Sweden
Same story about Poland. They pretend to same role of Empire in region as Russia but fail and stop to exist.
>>2241539
This was berry interdasting until you got all shitty and /int/ at the end.
>>2241558
Not yet. If it becomes complete shit in here, then it's Farnsworth time.
>>2241570
You mean sucking my dick?
>>2241564
Non-pleasant truth is truth still.
>>2241581
Your post just comes across as an asshurt Dane who's still frothing at the mouth when he wakes up every morning and realizes Scania is still, and will always remain, Swedish.
>>2241585
wrong. I'm Russian, sorry if cause butthurt to you by my truth.
>>2241585
he is obviously Russian
you can tell by all the spelling errors in his posts
>>2241592
>Russia
>somehow not a backwater
>>2241606
>somehow not a backwater
wut?
>>2241581
Those hats at the front are reeeeaaally fucking cool.
Nobody outside of serious military or European historians know that Sweden had a flash of greatness in the late 17th century up until the early 18th century.
>>2241560
wtf i hate russians now
>>2241539
Doesn't Anglo sources differ between Northmen and Danes? I know that in modern Swedish, Norwegian and Danish, the term for a Norwegian is literally translated as "North-man". Would it be dumb to say that Northmen means Norwegians and Danes as Danes?
>>2243620
No Anglo sources use the term "Dane" to refer to all Scandinavians.
>>2241494
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=oPHKn1JYHcA
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Us2ylGAwBnk
Vikings fight with a swords and charge and yell and stuff. Caroleans marched up to you and then shot.
It's for the same reasons folks don't care about pretty much any soldiers between the invention of the arquebus and the napoleonic wars, tech was such that soldiers are uninteresting to non-autists.
I love them of course, I'm certain others here do, but you know how normies are. They're not like us.
>>2241606
So if Russia is a backwater that somehow invalidates his points? Despite him talking like a retard he's still correct, Sweden was a shithole until the early modern period.
>>2244303
For how long was Russia a shithole?
>>2241539
Slavs literally invited Swedes to become their rulers.
Your move.
>>2242068
Yeah sure anon, we're all serious historians here
>>2244416
Forever. Your point?
>>2244470
>Russians
>Slavs
You should know better at this point. They're mostly Finnic.