Catholics of /his/, are you praying for the Church in her

Catholic general? Okay.

What does /his/ think of The Young Pope?

>>2240339
Not seen it yet but the reviews are weirdly good.

I saw Silence last weekend, it's great. Not sure if /his/ approved though

>>2240332
Catholics aren't Christian

>>2240464

Fuck off Protestant scum.

>>2240332

Nah, I'm a lapsed/cultural Catholic who attends very irregularly now, but I still like the Church. Did something bad happen? I'll offer up a prayer.

File: peter-turkson.jpg (57KB, 1024x752px)

57KB, 1024x752px

>>2240468
Just do a Google or Twitter search for "dubia." It's a mess.

Basically the Pope put out an apostolic exhortation that seems to allow divorced and remarried Catholics who have not yet received an annulment to take Communion, despite the fact that, until their annulment is granted, a remarried Catholic in a sexual relationship with their partner is living in a state of mortal sin.

The four cardinals in the OP submitted four questions, or "dubia," trying to clarify the issue. Pope Francis refused to answer the questions, so after about two months the cardinals made the questions public, and it's been bad ever since. Bishops and cardinals have been quarreling. The pope has refused to lead.

It's honestly very frustrating. I was a big fan of Francis until this, but he's deeply disappointed me here. He ought to answer the questions, regardless of what that answer is. He ought to step up and produce clarity in the Church.

>>2240468
Fuck you papist
Your wafers belong in urinals

>>2240464
Protestants aren't Christian

Atheist here, let me tell you Catholics something.
If you look at the universe as a whole, from the big bang to the first step a creature that could be called homo sapiens took on Earth, and taking into account the modern achievements of science, you'll realize that there is no reason why you shouldn't ignore the protestant retard.

>>2240481
We're the only true Christians, we're the only ones who believe the bible

>>2240471
Really sick of bishops in general who don't teach clearly in the name of being "pastoral." The Church needs more men like these four cardinals.

The issue is literally over a single footnote as well, it's infuriating. Bishops know at this point that teachings like "people who are in an adulterous relationship can't receive communion" don't change. There's just no excuse for it.

>>2240484
>atheists are pro-Catholic and anti-Christian
really makes you think

>>2240488
The parts you kept that is.

>>2240500
We have all 66 books

File: Dubia-cockroach-female-near-ruler.jpg (199KB, 1024x632px) Image search: [Google]

199KB, 1024x632px

>>2240471
Atheist here, I'm actually kind of curious about this, but am loathe to click on random websites to find out more about it.

What were the questions?

Also I found this while googling dubia.

File: 1398549528406.gif (2MB, 300x290px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 300x290px

>>2240502
>those 66 books
>all

>>2240503
This pretty much explains the issue:

http://www.ncregister.com/blog/edward-pentin/full-text-and-explanatory-notes-of-cardinals-questions-on-amoris-laetitia

If you want to look at the text it's talking about directly you can find a link to the text of "Amoris Laetitia" in the article. Scroll down to 305 and read footnote 351 for the problematic text.

>>2240516
Judith 1:1 is a blatant historical error

File: 1429106267526.jpg (82KB, 826x815px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 826x815px

>>2240522
>Says Protestants believe in the bible
>"here's this part of the bible we don't believe"
Good joke, protestants.

>>2240529
>Judith
>the bible
pick one

>>2240332
I'm not a Roman Catholic, but I still pray for the church every day