Any English major here who can spot out the grammatical

>>2221938

Where the fuck do you think you are? Go back to

>>>/lit/

>>2221938
Use of "they" as a singular pronoun

>>2221972
Singular they has been around since the 1300s

>>2221972
How? Any example?

>>2221972
What should be used instead.

>>2221938
no comma after shit

>>2222013
she

>>2221972
Wrong.

>>2221972
if anyone thinks they can't use "they" as a singular pronoun then they should reread this sentence.

Lack of punctuation.

File: 14234622055.jpg (37KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 500x375px

>>2221938
This is intentionally written to be as grating as possible to read, isn't it?
Cause this sentence structure is triggering the hell out of me.

>>2221938
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

They've should be she's.

>>2221938
did you sperg out and make fun of someones grammar without knowing if they actually made a mistake? Knowing full well most people make mistakes in a pathetic attempt to discredit whoever you were arguing with. I'm more curious at the context of this message and why you need us to make you sound smart.

>>2221938
Need comma after but

You need a comma after women in the last sentence. I'm pretty sure those are two independent clauses, so the formula goes clause[, conjunction] clause.

>write the shit down