Does supporting capitalism means you also support inmigration

Free market means free movement of capital and labor. So yes.

>>2200734
>whites don't breed because of shit economic conditions (outsourcing)
>wages stagnate
>people can't afford to raise children
>there's a demographic cliff
>the capitalism system can't survive without growth
>to promote growth in the economy we need younger workers
>is cheaper to import blacks and muslims than breed whites

No.

You want immigration to only fill the gaps that are left open by newly created jobs.

Technically you could go over your job growth and your GDP would be highest, but it means in 30-40 years your GDP per capita would be less than ideal.

The most IDEAL longer term GDP per capita is using your native population to breed at a rate that gives you long term gdp per capita sustainance, assuming your natural resources are not going to subjected to paradigm shifts.

Countries that are like saudi arabai have an asset that will be worthless in 60 years (oil), so they'd profit immensely from immigrants. The United States benefits a little bit from immigrants because it also has oil, but the oil market is trash right now since everybody is rushing to sell, so the U.S. would not explicitly benefit from having more new workers than job growth.

>>2200754
see
>>2200741

>>2200721

Yes, because big government bureucrats with their commie regulations shouldn't interfere in my quest for cheap cambodian workforce.

#Make America Great for Entrepeneurship Again
#Trump_is_no_friend_of_business

>>2200758
>>2200754
They'd need to

1. Fix the absolute dogshit marriage and custody system so that having a child isn't risking ruining your entire life

2. Maybe institute breeding propaganda

3. Cut social programs in general to make room for tax cuts for families

4. Make a federal law disallowing cities to evict families splitting mortgages.

None of these will ever happen because the fed doesn't give a shit; they will just use cheap imported labor.

>>2200721
>>2200734
>>2200738
>>2200741
>>2200754
>>2200758
>>2200768
>>2200772
all I hear is some blabber about 'almighty money'

>>2200814
>economics is blabber

>>2200721
A white nation? What, does it snow a lot?

>>2200721
Yes. If you're pro-capitalism, you're pro-immigration and pro-globalism.

>>2200814
You may consider finish middle school if that's the case.

>>2201395
>gdp per capita dips long term, resulting in poverty, unenployment and crime
You niggers havnt even read adam smith let alone understanding the pussy version of capitalism employed now.

>>2200738
That would be liberalism, capitalism is merely about private control of means of production and their use to gain profit.

>>2201697
>What is prudence in the conduct of every private family, can scarce be folly in that of a great kingdom. If a foreign country can supply us with a commodity cheaper than we ourselves can make it, better buy it of them with some part of the produce of our own industry, employed in a way in which we have some advantage. The general industry of the country, being always in proportion to the capital which employs it, will not thereby be diminished... but only left to find out the way in which it can be employed with the greatest advantage.

From this it follows that the free flow of capital, including human capital, is necessary to maximize each country's comparative advantage. This also allows for more equitable distribution of resources because there can be a Pareto optimal quantity of labor supplied in various markets.