What caused the proto indo europeans to be so successful in spreading

>>2199478
They were fucking dickheads

>>2199478
Europe was barely even populated before They moved there

>>2199545
Europe was densely populated by Near Eastern farmers.

>>2199478

Only reason I can think of is racemixing.

PIE were biracial(Eastern HG+Caucasus) while on the other hand Neolithic Farmers in Europe were monoracially Anatolian and apparently racist again Europeans(Western HG).

Native Europeans had brown, possibly very brown skin whereas Neolithic farmers were fair so this skin color contrast might have a thing or two to do with their continued monoracial makeup for 4000 years.

Neolithic farmers were too damn racist to "blanda upp" to succeed while on the other hand the rowdy PIE boys fucked anything and got tons of good genes which allowed to be healthy and vigilant.

patrilineal race rules

>>2199552
Barely, also Near Eastern farmers means literally nothing, they were Anatolian farmers, thus genetically completely different from Mesopotamian farmers and the farmers from the Levant, thus there is no such thing as Near Eastern farmer, also said farmers were heavily mixed with Mesolithic hunter gatherers from Europe.

>>2199610
> and apparently racist again Europeans(Western HG).

This is one of the dumbest things I've ever read about this topic, neolithic farmers from Europe were like 1/4-1/3 European hunter gatherer on average

>>2199811

Not even close. They NEVER had European mitochondrial DNA. It was ALWAYS Anatolian.

Maybe once in a blue moon a Euro mofo knocked up one of their women and the offspring passed as Farmer but that wasn't enough to make them 1/4 Euro.
They were in Europe for four fucking thousand years and the ones in Ireland had still overwhelmingly Anatolian DNA in 3000 BC, and you say no evidence of racism? Get real. They abhorred racemixing with Europeans.

>>2199478
Can someone explain me the Basques?

>>2199875

Neolithic farmers with some European and Indo-European admixture. Dumb language.

>>2199478
How many times are you going to ask this?

The answer is: horse + wheel + patriarchism + racism

>>2199610
>Neolithic farmers were fair
Nope. Among aforementioned groups only EHG and possibly CHG were fair

>>2199932

Fair in comparison to Western HGs.
By modern North Euro centric standards someone with an 'Italian complexion' would be dark, but if you compare it to someone from the land of Tamils...

>>2199945
Ah ok. If that is what you meant, I agree

>>2199478
higher foreheads

File: wazi.jpg (107KB, 633x634px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 633x634px

>>2200051

>>2199835
They had it.

Are people still trying to pass this off as anything but genocide? Seems a pretty clear-cut case of proto-mongols raping burning pillaging and settling everything, or at least conquering the areas

>>2199932
>patriarchism > racism

You're fucking retarded, early band level societies were agnatic with little to no emphasis on gender while only segmentary tribes started developing patriarchism. If you're talking about racism you're also fucking retarded because the reason Indoeuropean languages are so prevalent is because of race mixing for so a long time

>>2200065
You are a complete fucking retard and you should kill yourself

>>2200065
>What is population density

If an aggressive tribe moves in your area you can just move a few miles north or even join them and fuck together for ethnogenesis. Kys pseud

File: 12003354_1637856663140199_8893022541397475669_n.jpg (41KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 480x480px

>>2200065
>of proto-mongols raping burning pillaging and settling everything

what is cultural enrichment

coming to a place near you sponsored by Global Empire 2.0

>>2200065

While it may have been a genocide, does it even matter?
Neolithic farmers were nasty people themselves with elaborate cannibalistic rituals.
European hunters were more or less a bunch of retards running around with no intention of ever creating a civilization or even building a house.

Did the world really lose anything from IE expansion to Europe?

>>2200076
>Neolithic farmers were nasty people themselves with elaborate cannibalistic rituals.

Are you talking about Minoans?

File: sogdianafgan.jpg (42KB, 480x720px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 480x720px

>>2200069
eli rogers detected

>>2200081

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herxheim_(archaeological_site)

>>2200087
Interesting

File: YMkg.png (206KB, 734x1043px) Image search: [Google]

206KB, 734x1043px

>>2199811

They had very little hunter gatherer admixture in them

File: admixture.png (54KB, 350x351px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 350x351px

>>2200127
That neolithic farmer component already include Mesolithic admixture to some degree

>>2200130
http://www.pnas.org/content/112/38/11917.full.pdf

Source of the picture, a recent study

>>2200130

>Mesolithic admixture to some degree

European-like, from Anatolia. Probably quite old.
Stuttgart doesn't look mixed with Euros compared to NE(from Anatolia IIRC).
Iceman very little.

>>2200147
Probably came to Anatolia through the Balkans

>>2199932
>horse + wheel + patriarchism + racism
You can almost see the Stone Age SJWs protesting:

>GROG BAD PATRIARCH
>GROG SEXIST TO CAVEWIMMENS
>GROG RACIST TO BLACK CAVEPEOPLE

>>2200274

SJWs exist only because western men act weak.

>>2200069
>If you're talking about racism you're also fucking retarded because the reason Indoeuropean languages are so prevalent is because of race mixing for so a long time
PIEs spread their language by killing males and breeding with females of encountered peoples.

>>2200065
t. millenial """historian"""

File: horses.jpg (295KB, 1440x1080px) Image search: [Google]

295KB, 1440x1080px

>>2199478
>What caused the proto indo europeans to be so successful in spreading across europe and into northern india?
pic related.