What do you think about carthographical anomalies and the possibilty

File: ca263185478027773179f2468ae5cec6.jpg (428KB, 1713x1201px) Image search: [Google]

428KB, 1713x1201px

>>2191145

Where the hell could a civilisation "as advanced as Great Britain in the 18th century" could be based that there wouldn't be some sort of evidence? That's ayy lmao as fuck.

>>2191214
Do you mean physical evidences? Because in theory that civilization existed more than ten thousands of years ago. I'm not sure if England would have sunk in 1752 some could retrieve physical evidences in 11752. All we have is some strange maps, myths and religious costumes.Those might have a common background. Why would that be ayy?

>>2191486
There would be endless physical evidence of a civilisation of that size and duration.

>>2191486
there is no way in fuck that you just cited the right century, mate. try Britain in the 12th century for the mystery civ.

>>2191145

The view of the world back then was based off of religious understanding, not factual, unbiased observation.

That is why many maps back then featured "Antarctica" although it was not discovered until much later. It was hypothesized that if there is an "Arctic," there should be a landmass in the south to balance it out. There isn't actually any landmass at the north pole.