How reliable is John Green's Crash Course content? Specifically

>>2176353
not at all

>>2176353
every fucking day with these threads holy fuck stop

>>2176353
Fuck this guy

>>2176353
If you're are anything outside of complete centrist liberal you'll sperg out.

>>2176353
Not very.

>>2176353
the G.O.A.T.

now go away

>>2176353

>John-"white people..."

>audience of indoctrinated children and their 20 something women babysitters (teachers)-"booooo!!!"

>John-"...suck"


>viewers-"YEAH!"

There's plenty of legitimate criticism of him but most people here only hate him because he's somewhat liberal, and they tend to be the same people who use "cuck" and "nu-male" unironically

Watch it and decide for yourself instead of listening to memers

File: 1480698634231.png (105KB, 954x1157px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 954x1157px

>>2176658

I wonder who could be behind this post

>>2176353
John Green is THE most important person of the 21st century.

>>2176658
This. One has to understand that these are entry-level videos with not a lot of detail. They're like 10 minute short introductory videos meant to cater to a popular audience. They might be biased nut but all historians are biased one way or another.

>>2176665
le "_________" boogeyman

>>2176665

>omg the /pol/ boogeymen!

>bitch about use of boogeyman+strawmanning

really made me think

>>2176665
Napoleon Bonaparte made that post?

>>2176353
American high school level

>>2176446
"John Green" gets four times as many search results in the archive than "Abraham Lincoln".

High school level.

>>2176353

its at most a grade schooling about various topics.

File: 42387429083.png (139KB, 377x387px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 377x387px

Pop science and history

File: departed from warehouse.jpg (874KB, 1166x854px) Image search: [Google]

874KB, 1166x854px

I swear all you fuckers do is give attention to the very retards that shouldn't be given attention.

>>2176353
They're a pretty based, C L A S S C O N S C I O U S intro to history.

>>2176669
this

>>2176669
>>2179406
t.john green

File: 1482518031568.png (2MB, 750x1334px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 750x1334px

>>2176353
Why are there constantly threads asking this same question over and over again on here?

>>2176520
>Is Alexander really that great? Let's look at how the passage of time improves our perception of dictators who were actually responsible for a lot of people dying. Did you know the Greeks were fighting to preserve slavery?
>except for the Mongols meme xD

>>2176353
Cuck

The man gets off to the thought of fucking a bowl of cheerios.

>>2179470
So? They unironically make most people think and question the historical narrative we're usually taught. Considering the first point in particular, people tend to demonized Napoleon and lionize Alexander, for example, despite the fact that they basically did the same thing and that the latter was probably worse. Most people don't realize how ruthless he really was (as most ancient conquerors were) and applying our modern beliefs to him in a way that we usually don't and questioning the traditional historiography in this matter can be pretty interesting to someone who's never really thought about it

Now you might complain that this point really isn't all that profound and is actually kind of simplistic or sophomoric, but it's a fucking introduction to history, not a critical analysis of historiography, so I'm not sure what you're expecting if that's the case

>>2179495
The point was that concept is unequally applied especially in their videos about the Mongols and the expansion of Islam.

>>2179495
>people tend to demonized Napoleon
I've literally never seen this

>>2179510
anglos do

>>2176353
unreliable

>>2179837
>Anglos do
Not surprised. Surprisingly in the USA Napoleon isn't looked at that unfavorably.

>>2176678
>>2176685
Not an argument

>>2176665
>the white supremacists would flee

Lol, should we tell him?

John Green is the new man.

The new sort of man. You all know the kind. He's been completely castrated. He's been divorced from anything primal. Completely shorn of any crimethink.

He's like a little, supple, baby-oiled infant. A modern Cupid. A little faggy nothing of a thing who believes in nothing and flaps in the goddamn breeze, whichever way it happens to be flapping.

Tell me, would you ever respect a man who makes a fortune telling 13-year-old girls what they want to hear? Would you ever respect a man who writes fiction for girls whose breasts are still budding?

Look at him and weep. You see a piece of yourself in him, don't you? That piece that you're ashamed of. That cringing little coward in the corner of your soul.

For like him you've never cut down a pine. Never stood on a cliff's edge, bare-chested, roaring into the great wilds. Never killed with your hands.

The fire is gone from his eyes. The fire that the ancients had. The great men of eminence.

And now we have "logic" and "reason" and they're a small consolation to a beastly heart, which still beats, faint as it may be, still beats.

Can you hear it in your chest?

>>2180214
I can, good post. About to wrestle a pack of hogs now

>>2180214
sent ;)

http://www.johngreenbooks.com/contact/