I always see people nowadays talking about the Middle East as

File: 4789-004-60DFAD69.jpg (199KB, 629x449px) Image search: [Google]

199KB, 629x449px

I always see people nowadays talking about the Middle East as though its radical Muslims, violence, and instability are all almost a result of themselves. That is, their religion just became or perhaps always was this radical by itself, that its hatred of the West is similarly natural, that its incompatibility with ideals of Western civilization and the United States is similarly natural.

However, is there really just no reason that this part of the world and this culture became this way? I ask because I am not super well-versed in world history, but I seem to remember quite a bit of European intervention following the collapse of the Ottoman Empire in the early-mid 20th century. More specifically, that Europe sort of 'propped up' the remains of the Ottoman empire and then eventually just withdrew this artificial stability? I don't remember exactly.

Main point is that I'm not trying to sympathize with the Middle East and all of its detested attributes and cultures and people, and I'm not trying to say who is to blame. I am only asking- is all of the terrorism, the instability, the radical Islam, and the hatred of the West in the Middle East only the 'fault' of the region, or is there some crucial history behind the region and its relationship to the West that might better explain its many problems?

Note that I really am coming at this with an impartial view. I see people online always talk shit about Islam and its incompatibility with the West, but I am wondering if perhaps this region and its ideals and its issues are a part of a 'bigger picture' of Western intervention rather than only an inherently destructive ideology.