In 1942-1945 there was a massive typhus epidemic across Europe

>>2161049
>In 1942-1945 there was a massive typhus epidemic across Europe which is what caused the vast majority of concentration camp deaths, including Anne Frank.

Yes, so massive, that the Nazis felt they needed to build crematoria facilities capable of incinerating the entire populations of their prison camps in a week, all the while shoveling in more people that kept them burning.

>There is no proof that zyklon b was used in sufficient concentrations to cause massive human death

Well, other than the HCN found in the human hair remains of Auschwitz victims, and the fact that you need considerably less of the stuff to kill people than you do to disinfect.

> residue in brick samples was consistent with concentrations for delousing rather than mass killing.

Then why did Jan Markiewicz, Wojeich Gubala, and Jerzy Labedz come to very different conclusions in their 1994 report? Why are the HCN levels enormously higher in the crematoria and the gassing chambers than in the barracks that would need to be disinfected if this was really to combat a typhus epidemic?

>>2161049
0/10 trolling attempt go back to /pol/

>>2161078

>Nazis felt they needed to build crematoria facilities

so as not to contaminate the ground or others around them. What did people in the black plague do to corpses? thats right they burned them.

>capable of incinerating the entire populations of their prison camps in a week

entirely untrue. Auschwitz camp with its 6 ovens could only burn a maximum of about 15-20 bodies a day with their limited coke fuel supplies.

>all the while shoveling in more people that kept them burning.

bodies don't burn by themselves retard. the human body is up to 60% water

>HCN found in the human hair remains of Auschwitz victims

not true. many inmates had their hair cut. others were deloused

> residue in brick samples was consistent with concentrations for delousing rather than mass killing.

look at the Leuchter report done and the first Polish survey in 1991 found no evidence of gas being used

Rudolf Höss, commandant of Auschwitz, said that the use of Zyklon-B to kill prisoners came about on the initiative of one of his subordinates, SS-Hauptsturmführer (captain) Karl Fritzsch, who used the substance to kill some Russian POWs in late August 1941 in the basement of Block 11 in the main camp. The experiment was repeated on more Russian POWs, with Höss watching, in September.[28][29] Block 11 proved unsuitable for mass killings, as the basement was difficult to air out afterwards and the crematorium (Crematorium I, which operated until July 1942) was some distance away.[29] The site of the killings was moved to Crematorium I, where more than 700 victims could be killed at once.[30] By the middle of 1942, the operation was moved to Auschwitz II–Birkenau, a nearby satellite camp which had been under construction since October 1941.[20]

The first gas chamber at Auschwitz II–Birkenau was the "red house" (called Bunker 1 by SS staff), a brick cottage converted to a gassing facility by tearing out the inside and bricking up the windows. It was operational by March 1942. A second brick cottage, the "white house" or Bunker 2, was converted some weeks later.[31][20] According to Höss, Bunker 1 held 800 victims and Bunker 2 held 1,200 victims.[32] These structures were in use for mass killings until early 1943.[33] At that point, the Nazis decided to greatly increase the gassing capacity of Birkenau. Crematorium II, originally designed as a mortuary, with morgues in the basement and ground-level incinerators, was converted into a killing factory by installing gas-tight doors, vents for the Zyklon B to be dropped into the chamber, and ventilation equipment to remove the gas afterwards.[34][c] Crematorium III was built using the same design. Crematoria IV and V, designed from the start as gassing centers, were also constructed that spring. By June 1943, all four crematoria were operational. Most of the victims were killed using these four structures.[35]

>>2162602
>Leuchter report
Here we go again...

>entirely untrue. Auschwitz camp with its 6 ovens could only burn a maximum of about 15-20 bodies a day with their limited coke fuel supplies.

>I told him that at this time 3 double-muffle ovens are in operation, with a capacity of 250 per day. Further, currently under construction are 5 triple muffle ovens with a daily capacity of 800. Today and in the next few days, 2 eight-muffle ovens, each with a daily capacity of 800, will come on consignment, redirected from Mogilew.

~ Memo from Kurt Prüfer of 8 September 1942

>>2161049
Oh boy, another holocaust denial thread. In no way will this just be a repeating of the same untrue evidence about a massive Jewish conspiracy to fool the world to get gibsmedats.

>>2162602

>so as not to contaminate the ground or others around them. What did people in the black plague do to corpses? thats right they burned them.

Birkenau had four crematory buildings, each with five ovens with three entrances each. This is much larger capacity than a simple labor camp needs, even with a typhus epidemic that is miraculously capable of killing millions.

>not true. many inmates had their hair cut. others were deloused

There are traces of HCN in Auschwitz human hair, as reported by actual people who examined the hair that exists in the museum. If you are in doubt of that, get someone to go to the museum test a sample of that.

Inmates were shaved BEFORE delousing. You are saying either that:

- They were deloused before being shaved, and Zyklon B was used in that delousing (which is ridiculous because small concentrations of Zyklon are lethal to humans, let alone concentrations strong enough to leave traces in hair, so such a "delousing" is actually the homicidal gassing that happened at Auschwitz);

- They were shaved before being deloused, and their hair was subjected to Zyklon B for no reason whatsoever.

Both of those things are stupid beyond belief. So the only option is that the hair was subjected to Zyklon along with its owner, and then shaved. But since Zyklon is lethal to humans even in small doses, that can only mean the hair's owner was gassed with it.

>look at the Leuchter report done and the first Polish survey in 1991 found no evidence of gas being used

>Leuchter

Now I know you are trolling. Leuchter picked up a rock in the place and concluded from that there were no gassings. As evidence, HCN in human hair trumps no blue stains in some rock some idiot picked up that might not even belong to the place where the gassings happened (as the kremas were dynamited so things might have been scattered).

POL BTFO

File: sixmillion-34appearances.jpg (357KB, 1271x1279px) Image search: [Google]

357KB, 1271x1279px

>>2162636

truth fears no trail

>>2162630

are you really going to base a extracted testimony as evidence? might as well include Eichmanns soviet U-boat story and Kurt Gerstein 25 million death toll.

>>2162702
>muh six gorillon

You know that the "6 million" number is just a popular approximation and that the actual numbers as discussed by historians is around 5-5.5 million, right?

Of course you don't know, you're not familiar with Holocaust historiography, you know just /pol/ and CODOH memes.

>>2162702
6 million died, of which hundreds of thousands were gassed
there's both testimony from nazis, prisoners and others AND scientific data to prove what happened, so it really is quite conclusive

>>2162728

>quite conclusive

sure thing bud. no mention of the fake gas chamber at Dachau or the Soviet built chimney at Auschwitz

>>2162723

6millionTM is the official number used. some say between 5-6 million.

>>2162742
>sure thing bud. no mention of the fake gas chamber at Dachau or the Soviet built chimney at Auschwitz

The Soviet replica was in Krema I, which was not the major player in the Auschwitz part of the genocide, and you know it. Kremas II-V and the bunkers were and they weren't reconstructed.

>6millionTM is the official number used.

Yeah, forgot about the final word of the Official Holocaust Comittee in Tel Aviv.

>>2162742
the only fake thing is your 'studies' and 'sources' - it's all a laughable trainwreck, designed to make it seem there's a "debate"

as with every argument and data that comes with political motivations - it's crap

>>2162750
You are a Nazi sympathizer. You are a train wreck.

Eh
http://imgur.com/a/725A7
http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2012/10/index-of-published-evidence-on.html
http://4archive.org/board/his/thread/509405

>we dindu nuffin we put the jews in camps for shit and giggles

File: nazis_gud_boys.jpg (138KB, 570x699px) Image search: [Google]

138KB, 570x699px

>>2162939

>>2162742

There's no such thing as an "official number".