has Hitlers failures pretty much made it impossible for a Nazi

>>2103690
No we'll see it in the next few decades.

It should have done but Globalism took the piss.

>>2103690
Explicitly yes. At least for the foreseeable future.
Otherwise no. All the problems that propelled the NSDAP to power are still around and liberal democracies still have no defence against the tactics they used, I'd say we're probably going to see more than a bit of neo-Nazi activity in our lifetimes.

>>2103699

>All the problems that propelled the NSDAP to power are still around and liberal democracies still have no defence against the tactics they used,

Explain

>>2103717
abusing freedom of speech.

>>2103699
I doubt you know what Nazism was about. Protip; it wasn't white nationalism, it was about Germanic people subjugating other whites (Slavs mostly).

>>2103690
Let's hope so.

>>2103726
How does that have anything to do with what he said?

Yes, although national socialism is still viable today. Just look at India.

>>2103717
Using force and exploiting the parliamentary process to game the system until you get your way. Also it's worth mentioning that it's not just the conscious tactics that liberal democracies are very impotent against, but also the appeal of fascism in general.

>>2103726
That has absolutely nothing to do with what I said.

File: 14499100_558389077703523_4125441582457421824_n.jpg (72KB, 750x623px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 750x623px

>>2103690

yes. also the fact that nazism is a completely dead ideology and even the modern versions of it dont understand it at all. Neo-Nazi groups are just racist groups. Thats it. They have nothing in common with the nazi party other than similar racist views of jews and blacks.

Also, they are retarded LARPers who think Hitler was a "white nationalist"

File: 1433722315211.jpg (35KB, 392x372px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 392x372px

>>2104444

>>2103749
>national socialism

What is national socialism anyway?

File: NNN.jpg (18KB, 560x300px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 560x300px

>>2104618
Where a government has complete control over its citizens and their wages. Taxing them about 70% of their income, forcing males to a mandatory military service, and is race driving. It is basically communism...I don't know why /pol/ loves it so much. We love Freedom of speech but are so willing to give it away. Should just be a nationalist if anything.

>>2104618
Whatever you want it to mean, as long as you are killing subhumans desu.

>>2103690

Nazis are autistic and can't adapt.

>What? Swedes have lost their minds and want open borders with Africa and Middle-East? Hitler said Swedes are the master race so they must be brainwashed or something. Damn the Jews who did this!

>>2104651
>Should just be a nationalist if anything.

well thats the thing. most neo-nazis are just retarded newfag teenagers from /b/ and dont even know what nationalism is, or understand that its a liberal ideology

The ironic thing is a lot of neo nazis actually believe in the socialist part of national socialism and don't understand that was basically just marketing to appeal to the working class

>>2104679

>DUDE THEY WERENT REALLY SOCIALIST!

yes they were anon.

File: Strasserism.jpg (67KB, 581x434px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 581x434px

>>2104679
Uh...no.
Many if not most neo-nazis are anti-socialism as they can be.
It's usually anti-Nazis, the American libertarian kind, who hate Nazis because they were "socialists" and "statists".

>that was basically just marketing to appeal to the working class
Partially true, but there was a strong component of the Nazi movement that seriously wanted a type of socialists. That part was eliminated in 1934.

>>2104618

Socialism, but for a specifc race, or nation if you will.

It's stupid.