I made a thread about him yesterday but i think it was ignored

are you creating the same thread over and over again in the hopes that you one day get an answer that confirms your bias by being in full favor of this man? it's not going to happen. the general consensus is that some of his stuff stands up under critical thinking and some of it does not.

>>2086608
Blows Marxian historiography the fuck out.

I really enjoyed it.

He considered himself a poet, not a historian, and his work should be read in that light.

>>2088568
bumping this thread to make you upset

i've only read the last chapter for a class and not being a history major it was extremely difficult to follow. the only general idea i got was historical development of europe differed from asia and so created liberalization which was responsible for the west.

>>2086608
Retarded shit from a history-on-rails faggot if you look at it as a serious attempt at viewing history.

>>2090245
interesting, sober thought if you look at it from this perspective

>>2088581
It's all the same shit, that's why it's trash. If you absolutely must cling to moth-eaten discredited views of history then read Pareto or something, for fuck's sake.

He never knew how right he was