How effective would the tactics and soldiers of Rhodock be in

>>2079999
ask /mbg/ you faggot

File: 1481530798483.png (498KB, 925x919px) Image search: [Google]

498KB, 925x919px

>>2079999
Stop having a nice head on your shoulders.

>>2079999
About as well as the Swiss did.

>>2079999
Pikes, glaives, pavise shields and crossbows were all common weapons in the high medieval period. The Rhodoks would do about as well as any other medieval infantry based army. In other words, fucking shit unless you're in mountains or forests or have some other terrain obstacles to bog down heavy cavalry. If you want to find out how well they'd do against any specific foe, just imagine that foe fighting the Swiss and you'll get a decent idea.

>>2079999
Except for the lack of cavalry, they are by far the most modern and arguably most effective faction.

File: Nords.jpg (1MB, 1680x1050px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1680x1050px

>>2079999
Ask these guys

>tactics

There are no tactics in the AI of Mount&Blade. I don't know what you are talking about. The AI will always either charge immediately, or advance ten paces every few seconds, and then charge.

Also get this shit the fuck off /his/.

File: King Harlaus.jpg (280KB, 1162x850px) Image search: [Google]

280KB, 1162x850px

>>2080117
But not this guy

>>2079999
To answer this look up burgandy France wars

>>2080117
>that oudated axe that breaks after repeated use
>could not afford full chainmail with hood and shits
>weakening his weapon hardiness with fullish inscriptions
>earrings
>no gauntlets
obviously a thal based on servitude in his eyes

>>2079999
They'd do well on uneven terrain, like with mountains and hills and shit.