Why do philosophers bother to try having opinions about the fundamental

File: XevQ3IY.jpg (272KB, 746x760px) Image search: [Google]

272KB, 746x760px

Why do physicists bother to try having opinions about ethics when they can't even solve the trolley problem?

>>2034830
Chess isn't a children's game. It has a huge possibility space which makes it extremely difficult to solve.

If you mean checkers, it is solved.

>>2034848
/lit/ and /v/ solved the trolley problem in a joint effort years ago

Why does OP bother being a faggot when he can't even the game?

>>2034919

>64 squares
>huge

This is why we should give up on trying to colonize the stars.

Can Stratego be solved?

It has incomplete information, bluffing and deceit so it's deeper than chess.

>>2034934

Technically you're allowed to use different positions to begin with, but in reality we all know you're always putting your flag in the corner surrounded by bombs.

>>2034934

Yes, there is an optimal strategy.

>>2034929
Man this takes me back. Good post.

>>2034919
>>2034830
Both checkers and chess are solved. No known being can defeat the machines we've developed.

>>2034973

I said fully solved. Chess isn't fully solved. You can develop a machine that no living human ever beats and still not have chess fully solved. Fully solved doesn't mean "built a machine that's objectively better than all living humans."

>>2034928
what was the solution

>>2034973

chess is not solved retard

>>2034963
except I pretend to do this while hiding it elsewhere, and I don't even put the decoy in the corner but slightly next to it. get on my level, scrub.

>>2035033

>not using corners
>not using the only way to completely surround two different single square positions with bombs

Garbage strategy.

>>2034973
>solved=/=machines are better than humans

File: black to move pick the winning move.png (67KB, 600x614px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 600x614px

>>2034830
Why do you post on an anime board when you are incapable of reaching 1200 ELO on a 64 square children's game?

>>2036839
h2>h1

>>2034934
>It has incomplete information, bluffing and deceit so it's deeper than chess.

So is rock paper scissors also deeper than chess?

>>2036856
Q takes and suddenly your passed pawn is gone.

>>2036861
After Nh5+, I don't think white can avoid mate without trading the queen for the rook, leaving black with a knight and a pawn advantage.

>>2036856
>h2>h1
then what? the move isn't complete.

>>2036856
Not quite. If pawn promotes to anything but knight, white can draw.

File: fischer_1200669653.jpg (188KB, 371x486px) Image search: [Google]

188KB, 371x486px

Bobby Fischer knew the absolute truth to that, among other things.

>>2036839
Does this have to be done in one move? If not, maybe g6 to g5 then f6 to h5

>>2037012
Can't move king into check.

what game can you play with 64 square children ?

>>2037034
Okay, what about g6 to g5, then f6 to e4, then f5 to e4, then h2 to h1 promote to knight.

>>2035000
KILL LESS PEOPLE YOU FUCKING IDIOT

>>2037136
Whoops meant g6 to h5 for first move.

>>2034973
>can't even beat a primitive computer at chess
>try having opinions about the fundamental nature of reality

>>2037364

>can't get a score higher than 3 in flappy bird
>own species went to the moon

Yeah

>>2036839
Kh5, Qf3!+

>>2037401
Scratch that I went full retard there.
Ne4+

>>2034984
well what does it mean

>>2037445
Wow. I really need to stop.
Kh7

File: linkola.jpg (8KB, 180x220px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 180x220px

>>2037316
>implying

>>2036982

>le commie jewish menace
>muh bright lights
>muh water

certifiable genius over the board tho, mad props.

The man singlehandedly rekt the Soviet chess machine.

>>2037470
What's wrong with kh5?

>>2037316

if you do nothing, you kill nobody. If you pull the switch, you are now a murderer.

Your logic would be thrown out in a court of law.

>>2037497
The white queen would take your knight, you would react by promoting your pawn for a queen but you'd be mated by Qg5

>>2037529
What if you promote that pawn to a knight instead?

>>2037547
...fuck

>>2036839

h1 queen, Qxh1, Ne4 ck, Qxe4, Pxe4

If after Ne4 ck the white king runs to h4, mate is inevitable after Rd3.

>>2034830
A computer can solve it. Why doesnt it have opinions about the fundamental nature of reality?

>>2036839
I think Kh5, Ne4, Pe4 which will take white queen, Ph1 promote to knight is the correct answer.

>>2037452
It means there is a known, perfect strategy that cannot be beaten by any other strategy, including computers. To find a perfect strategy, someone would need to show that no matter what moves the opponent makes, the perfect strategy wins (or draws, depending on if chess is a winnable game or not). There are so many possible moves, it's has not been feasible to prove this yet.

>>2037316
>muh utility