Hey guys, just working on a tierlist. Just thought i'd post

>>2024195
Why do you think Khomeini was a psychopath? Because of the radical islam part?

>>2024206
Also, who did he genocide?

>>2024195
Leo used his money to mack on bitches and had a 20yo qt dancer gf when he was like 80
That's another obvious +

>>2024207
His genocide count is the lowest here, roughly around 100.

File: sadasd.png (467KB, 1674x1149px) Image search: [Google]

467KB, 1674x1149px

It's coming along~!!!

>>2024316
Do you consider gallipoli to be genocide to qualify Churchill to be on the board?

>>2024324
It's just a meme that he had more of a hand in the Benghal famine than he did. Each rendition needs a little bait.

>>2024195
>Fidel
>Pinochet
>Khomenei
>Bomber Harris
>Mussolini

None of them are remotest genocidal as far as I'm aware. Stalin is very questionable as well, although some historians count the Ukrainian famine as a genocide.

>>2024216
if you kill 100 people, is that even a genocide technically? (unless I guess those 100 people are the only members of their group)

>>2024370
In terms of raw numbers sure, but they did commit genocide.

File: sadasd.png (535KB, 1211x849px) Image search: [Google]

535KB, 1211x849px

gonna remove text till I get a final version

>>2024575
napoleon was a nice guy

>>2024195

>rational and psychopath are diametrically opposed

psychopaths are hyper-rational, anon

>>2024618
I agree. Psychopath should be replaced by mad man or something

>>2024575
>Mao "Four Pests" Zedong is rational

File: sadasd.png (621KB, 1211x817px) Image search: [Google]

621KB, 1211x817px

Nearly everybody from before the 1800's is in the bottom right

>>2024663
I'll maybe move him later

>>2024684
i'd slide bush down a little on the y axis and more al-asad decisively onto the psychopath side. it's a 4chan meme magic thing to say he isn't.

File: 1446231671275.jpg (15KB, 269x253px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 269x253px

>>2024618
>diametrically
>opposite ends of one of two metrics

File: Hong_Xiuquan.jpg (33KB, 349x396px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 349x396px

>>2024684
Hitler was a very pleasant person to those around him, including subordinates and just ordinary Germans. Robespierre, however was a gigantic asshole who thought that terror and ethics were inextricably linked.

Pic related should be full psychopath, slight asshole

File: 1461545300292.gif (100KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 200x200px

>>2024684
What genocide did Dubya attempt? Was Katrina an inside job?

Remove the genocide part, replace the psychopath/rational axis with Dionysian/Apollonian, and that would actually make a pretty decent chart.

>>2024684
>Henry V

Literally what.

File: sadasd.png (670KB, 1172x817px) Image search: [Google]

670KB, 1172x817px

I need help deciding where to place Reagan.

Also, yes LBJ is listed as more feelsy than fucking robespiere. I am going to remake this chart with less clinging to the axises so I have more room.

>>2025022
Started a war for power and executed thousands of POWS.

>>2025003
shock and awe

>>2025021
why remove genocide part? Maybe if the chart gets bigger and more ideological in the future.

>>2025003
>deny climate change
>accidentally a hurrican
Literally no different from Stalin and famine

>>2026141
Ehhh, LBJ should probably be listed as nicer than everybody here.

File: Enver_Pasha_1911.jpg (20KB, 220x326px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 220x326px

You forgot someone.

File: meme list.png (86KB, 704x2334px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 704x2334px

Also check meme list, if you missed someone.

>>2026141

Henry killing POWs isn't realy equivalent to genocide, especially when it was done in response to the French killing noncombatants.

>>2024195
Why is Hitler on the list?

>>2024316
Tito had caused the death of less than 140000 people, there is no to be on that list, he also reforged six former colonies into a great power with a stabilizing role in geopolitics via the Non-Aligned movement, how does that make him an asshole?

File: stop.jpg (14KB, 288x288px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 288x288px

>>2024195
What is with /his/ using such loose standards for genocide recently? Like if someone in power kills somebody its a genocide to you people.
Is this an alt-right plot to make genocide seem commonplace to therefore make the acts of prior facism look less disgusting? Or is this just your run of the mill stupidity?

Either way, stop.

>>2027261
>>2027350
Hi tankies. There are thousands of solid leaders with less than 50 unneccasary civilian kills.

>Pinochet
>rational

Guy was actually dumb as a rock

>>2024195
Why can't a psychopath be rational you fucking nitwit?

>>2024618
That's also wrong you fucking faggot.

File: article-0-0065890C00000258-345_233x388.jpg (25KB, 233x388px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 233x388px

>>2027350
>fascism
National socialism*

>>2026246
Genocide is killing any large number of people, SUPPOSEDLY enemy combatants don't count.

Just because the word is stigmatized doesn't mean all perps are instantly satan, although i'd like to get source on the French first offenses since my knowledge of that war is questionable.

>>2027261
>140000 people
>not a lot
He also deported the Italians that had inhabited Istria and Dalmatia for centuries.

>>2027792
Yeah, I know. But you know that doesnt mean that >50 kills = genocide. Thats not the definition of the fucking word and you guys are deliberately misusing it. Not every battle between to people or two groups is a genocide when one loses.

And stop using the term "tankie" its not going to catch on, despite you taking every opportunity to post it in every thread. I have made no allusions to communism or supported it in any way. This is legit why everyone hates you guys. You trample on facts, then when someone calls you out you just yell "THEY ARE A COMMIE NOTHING THEY SAY IS TRUE."

>Stalin
>rational
nice meme

>>2027983
Thats just being more specific, You cant seriously be arguing that Nazis arent fascists.

>>2028838
Why not simply say "humans" instead? That's just being more vague. You can't argue that Nazis aren't humans.

>>2028846
"That fish has scales"
"Fish, I think you mean Trout."
"Thats just being more specific. You cant seriously be arguing that Trout arent fish?"
"Why not simply just say animal instead? Thats just being more vague. You cant argue that fish arent animals"

Thats what you sound like right now. Yeah I could say humans, but I chose to say fascists because I wanted to bring to mind the most famous genocide of the last century. One that was conducted under a fascist ideology known as Nazism. If communism has to answer for stalin, the fascism has to answer for hitler. Its not a difficult concept.

File: update.png (706KB, 1200x1200px) Image search: [Google]

706KB, 1200x1200px

>>2026141

>>2029036

dat crop

>>2028967
But you didn't say "that fascist had a genocide", you said "fascism is genocidal". The first would imply that that fascist in particular genocided (or that fish in particular has scales) and the second implies that fascism as a whole genocides (or that all fish have scales).

>>2024195
>Stalin
>Rational
Stalin was a paranoid nutcase who died because he was sick and his workers feared they would be taken care of if they disturbed him. Not at all logical.

>>2029094
I said "the acts of prior fascism" obviously alluding to nazis. The qualifier of "prior" also insinuates that not all fascism is genocidal. Despite how you may have interpreted it with your mongoloid brain I never said "All fascists are genocidal" and I never claimed that "fascism is genocidal" although obviously it has the capacity to get there. I simply pointed out that fascists have commited genocide in the past, real genocide, not "killed more than 50 people." I did this in an attempt to get more serious about the use of the term when you jumped in and sperged out about how I may have insinuated that all fascists were genocidal.

>>2029161
>it has the capacity to get there
Like every other ideology.

>fascists have commited genocide in the past, real genocide
And so has capitalism and communism.

What's the point of singling out fascism?

>>2029169
> Like every other ideology
Because quakers, libertarians, and hippies can do that w/o direcly contradicting their ideology...ok

> And so has capitalism and communism
Sources or examples pls

>>2024639
absolute mad man

>>2026153
mr bean?