What interpretation of quantum mechanics should be right from

When ideology tries to interpret science, ideology has gone too far.

>>2016598
copenhagen for sure. our realities exist within ourselves and overlap (superpositioned) with each other, which makes us all equals. Reality moves towards the most probable, which gives us motivation to work, hence blocking the communistic failure. And its our absolute belief in the system that holds the system as a whole together to begin with.

>>2016598
"Transgressing the Boundaries: Towards a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity" proposed that quantum gravity has progressive political implications, and that the "morphogenetic field" could be a cutting-edge theory of quantum gravity (a morphogenetic field is a concept adapted by Rupert Sheldrake in a way that Sokal characterized in the affair's aftermath as "a bizarre New Age idea").[2] Sokal wrote that the concept of "an external world whose properties are independent of any individual human being" was "dogma imposed by the long post-Enlightenment hegemony over the Western intellectual outlook".[1]

After referring skeptically to the "so-called scientific method", the article declared that "it is becoming increasingly apparent that physical 'reality'" is fundamentally "a social and linguistic construct". It went on to state that because scientific research is "inherently theory-laden and self-referential", it "cannot assert a privileged epistemological status with respect to counterhegemonic narratives emanating from dissident or marginalized communities" and that therefore a "liberatory science" and an "emancipatory mathematics", spurning "the elite caste canon of 'high science'", needed to be established for a "postmodern science [that] provide[s] powerful intellectual support for the progressive political project".

Moreover, the article's footnotes conflate academic terms with sociopolitical rhetoric, e.g.:

Just as liberal feminists are frequently content with a minimal agenda of legal and social equality for women and "pro-choice", so liberal (and even some socialist) mathematicians are often content to work within the hegemonic Zermelo–Fraenkel framework (which, reflecting its nineteenth-century liberal origins, already incorporates the axiom of equality) supplemented only by the axiom of choice.

File: 119933433_Lenin_v_Gorkah__1923_.jpg (225KB, 591x699px) Image search: [Google]

225KB, 591x699px

>>2016616
> mfw communsm is actually wave function
> both collapse after you try to observe them

>>2016598
In an alternative universe real communism (tm) can work.

>>2016702
What even is communism?