What is this cultural fascination with war and violence in the modern media, while these being a strong tabu in actual west society? If you ask someone about experiencing violence he certainly would avoid it and judge it as bad. If you actually put someone in a situation where violence is present or required, I mean some real blood or death, people tend to become shocked, wordless, full of panic.
Meanwhile more 'human' and harmless concepts like sexuality and nudity are much less accepted in common media and handled as tabu much more. Concepts like love, compassion and goodness are normally seeing as 'gay' and have much less place in the public media.
Interesting is that most consumers of 'violence products' are people who actually never went to war, harmed or even killed something - people like ''I eat flesh but would never kill a chicken''.
Death is a ever worser theme. People avoid thinking about it like hell, as it were the worst moment in life, but they keep watching deaths in movies and TV everyday. If some shitskinns die by famine, it's no problem at all, but if someone is shooted in my quartier, oh my god, it's the end of the world!
Don't understand me wrong, I love meat, I love to do some heavy sparring and I respect aggressiveness and violence as being essential in human nature. I never killed something, but I would do it if necessary, whatever if I like it or not. But for fucks sake, most violence in media is just pointless, disgusting and has a heavy load of negativity, how can people enjoy such shit?
Is this fascination a proof of great hypocrisy in today's human behavior?
Pic related. If I would post a comic with boobs, I would be banned. But some blood is ok.
Society is tame. Tame is boring. We escape it through cheap thrill via simulated violence. This is nothing new.
>>2012105
I like you.
>these being a strong tabu in actual west society?
Not that much.
Tabooisation of actual violence is somthing new here that started in the 60s while the macabre was always liked by the same generations that fought in the worldwars.
>why do people enjoy violence when there's no chance of them suffering from it while not liking violence when there is a chance of suffering from it
It's like when you adopt a puppy and it gets brave and starts aggressively play biting you but the moment it's confronted by a larger dog in the street it runs away with its tail between its legs.
>>2012251
> actual
> not really, just something new here
U wot m8
>>2012661
I meant, violence in entertainment was always there and simply got more bloodily as we got better faking gore and disturbing shit through improved media.
Then there is acceptance of violence in the society, war is manly, dogfights are exiting, knowing how to brawl is necessary, this has been dismantled in the 60-80s, the entertainment did not change.
>>2012258
Which EAP story is this?
>>2012679
Because that stuff is interesting to watch, even if you don't necessarily want it to happen to you.
>>2012679
By dogfights you mean real dogfights or the airplane shit? If the former I feel like we need to bring it back, animal pit fighting is masculine as fuck.